2
$\begingroup$

So far I have showed that $K$ is a normal subgroup and that the Operation defined on $G/K$ is abelian.

Now I have to show that if $\phi:G\rightarrow A$ is a group homomorphism and $A$ is abelian. Then there exists a $\phi':G/K\rightarrow A$ such that $\phi$ can also be expressed as $\phi '\circ\pi$, where $\pi$ is the natural homomorphism $\pi:G\rightarrow G/K$.

I know since $\phi$ is a homomorphism that $G/\ker(\phi)\cong \text{Im}(\phi)$.

So there exists a bijection $f:G/\ker(\phi)\rightarrow \text{Im}(\phi)$.

But I don't know how to prove that $\ker(\phi)=K$.

What I do know is that

$$z\in\{xyx^{-1}y^{-1},x\wedge y\in G\}=:S\Longrightarrow z\in \ker(\phi)\Longrightarrow S\subseteq\ker(\phi)$$

Also by Definition of $K$, I know that $S\subseteq K$.

Now there might be elements in $K$ which cannot be expressed this way. Also there might be elements in the kernel which are not in $K$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I suppose you meant to write "...such that $\;\phi\;$ can be expressed as $\;\color{red}{\phi'}\circ\pi\;$ ..." $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio Feb 2 '19 at 18:05
  • $\begingroup$ yes you are right $\endgroup$ – RM777 Feb 2 '19 at 18:08
1
$\begingroup$

If $K$ and $N$ are normal subgroups and $K\leq N$ then the map $G/K\to G/N$ prescribed by $gK\mapsto gN$ is well defined and is a group homomorphism.

Denoting this map by $\nu$ for the natural homomorphisms $\pi_N:G\to G/N$ and $\pi_K:G\to G/K$ we find:$$\pi_N=\nu\circ\pi_K\tag1$$

Now if $\phi:G\to A$ is a group homomorphism where $A$ is abelian then for the subgroup $K$ mentioned in your question we find: $K\leq N:=\mathsf{ker}\phi$.

As usual we can write $\phi=\psi\circ\pi_N$ for a group homomorphism $\psi:G/N\to A$ and applying $(1)$ we find:$$\phi=\psi\circ\nu\circ\pi_K=\phi'\circ\pi_K$$

Here $\phi'=\psi\circ\nu:G/K\to A$ is a composition of group homomorphisms, hence is a group homomorphism.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand why $K\subseteq \ker(\phi)$ holds $\endgroup$ – RM777 Feb 2 '19 at 18:33
  • $\begingroup$ It is a consequence of $S\subseteq\mathsf{ker}(\phi)$ (mentioned in your question as something you know). Note that $K$ is the smallest subgroup that contains $S$ as a subset. $\endgroup$ – drhab Feb 2 '19 at 18:37
  • $\begingroup$ So there is a General Statement if $A$ is defined as the smallest subgroup that contains a set $S$ then every subgroup which contains $S$ must also contain $A$. Could you prove this Statement really quick or give me a source where I can see this Lemma? $\endgroup$ – RM777 Feb 2 '19 at 18:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In that situation: $A=\cap\{H\mid S\subseteq H, H\text{ subgroup}\}$. If $L$ is a subgroup that contains $S$ as a subset then $L\in\{H\mid S\subseteq H, H\text{ subgroup}\}$ and consequently $A=\cap\{H\mid S\subseteq H, H\text{ subgroup}\}\subseteq L$. $\endgroup$ – drhab Feb 2 '19 at 18:44
1
$\begingroup$

Observe that we know (or should know) that $\;G/N\;$ abelian iff $\;G'=[G,G]\le N\;$ , for $\;N\lhd G\;$. so

$$G/\ker\phi\cong\phi(G)\le A\;\text{(abelian)}\iff G'\le\ker\phi$$

But certainly $\;K\le G'\;$ as $\;G'\;$ contains all the products $\;[x,y]:=x^{1}y^{-1}xy\;$ (and all the elements generated by this kind of products), i.e.: $\;G'\;$ is one of the subgroups $\;H\;$ that appear in the intersections that is the definition of $\;K\;$, and we thus get that $\;K\le G'\le\ker \phi\;$ , from where we get that if we define

$$\phi':G/K\to A\;,\;\;\phi'(gK):=\phi g$$

Observe that

$$gK=xK\iff x^{-1}g\in K\le\ker\phi\implies\phi\left(x^{-1}g\right)=1\iff\phi'(xK)=\phi x=\phi g=\phi'(gK)$$

and $\;\phi'\;$ is well defined.

Now check that we indeed have $\;\phi=\phi'\circ\pi\;$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.