I'm trying to understand how some characterizations of the Riemannian volume form $dV$ are equivalent on an oriented Riemannian manifold of dimension $n$. I'm a bit new to Riemannian geometry (and self-studying it), and I can tell that it should just come down to a straightforward calculation, but I'm stuck for some reason.

Characterization 1: If $(\omega^1,...,\omega^n)$ is a local oriented orthonormal coframe for the cotangent bundle, then $dV=\omega^1\wedge...\wedge\omega^n$.

Characterization 2: If $(y^1,...,y^n)$ are oriented local coordinates, then $dV=\sqrt{\det(g_{ij})}dy^1\wedge...\wedge dy^n$ where $g_{ij}$ is the representation of the Riemannian metric in local coordinates.

I'm guessing that the square root of the determinant factor shows up from something involving $\det(A)=\sqrt{\det(A A^t)}$ for a suitable matrix $A$. I have a hunch that using uniqueness of the form (which follows for e.g. characterization 1 from the fact that you can cover the manifold with charts that have local oriented orthonormal coframes) might be important? Any help is very much appreciated!

  • $\begingroup$ Hint: If your $\partial_{y_i}$ are orthogonal then the metric is represented by a diagonal matrix with the lengths of the $\partial_{y_i}$ on the diagonal. What is the determinant, then? $\endgroup$ – Angelo Brillante Romeo Feb 2 at 16:18
  • $\begingroup$ You can only guarantee the existence of an orthonormal coordinate frame when the metric is flat though, right? $\endgroup$ – Ben Feb 2 at 16:22
  • $\begingroup$ Locally (i.e. in a small enough open neighborhood of a point) you can always find such frame! $\endgroup$ – Angelo Brillante Romeo Feb 2 at 16:38
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @AngeloBrillanteRomeo OP is referring to an orthonormal coordinate frame. $\endgroup$ – Amitai Yuval Feb 2 at 16:43
  • $\begingroup$ @AmitaiYuval Oh, sorry! $\endgroup$ – Angelo Brillante Romeo Feb 2 at 16:56

Let $dV$ denote the Riemannian volume form given by your first characterization, and let $y^1,\ldots,y^n$ be oriented local coordinates. Let $\frac{\partial}{\partial y^1},\ldots,\frac{\partial}{\partial y^n}$ denote the induced local frame of the tangent bundle, and let $e_1,\ldots,e_n$ be a local orthonormal frame of the tangent bundle. By definition, the matrix representation of the metric $g$ with respect to $e_1,\ldots,e_n$ at any point is the identity matrix. The matrix representation of $g$ with respect to $\frac{\partial}{\partial y^1},\ldots,\frac{\partial}{\partial y^n}$ is $(g_{ij})$.

Now, for a point $p$, let $A_p$ denote the transition matrix of the two above mentioned frames of the tangent space at $p$. Then it follows from characterization $1$ that $$dV\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial y^1},\ldots,\frac{\partial}{\partial y^n}\right)_p=\det A_p\cdot dV(e_1,\ldots,e_n)=\det A_p.$$On the other hand, by construction we have $$(g_{ij})_p=A_p^T\cdot I\cdot A_p=A_p^TA_p,$$and hence, $$\det A_p=\sqrt{\det(g_{ij})},$$ and it follows that $dV$ coincides with the volume form of your second characterization.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! This was exactly what I was looking for. $\endgroup$ – Ben Feb 2 at 21:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.