Norm in Sequence Space such that Convergence in Norm does not imply Pointwise Convergence I'm wandering if there exist a norm defined on the sequence space $\mathbb{F}^{\omega}$ such that there exist a sequence that converges in norm but it doesn't converge pointwise, element by element.
The same thing is asking for a sequence whose norm converges to $0$ but whose elements does not converge to $0$:
$$\exists \{x^{(n)}\}, k \mid \lVert x^{(n)} \lVert \rightarrow 0, \ x^{(n)}_k \nrightarrow 0$$
I couldn't find any example.
 A: Stop the presses: In fact this is trivial. It holds for any norm on the space of all complex sequences. If you can't find an example that's just because you can't "find" an example of a norm on that space to begin with - it seems clear the existence of a norm must depend on the axiom of choice.


Sheer Triviality. Let $S$ be the space of all complex sequences. If $||\cdot||$ is a norm on $S$ there exists a sequence of vectors in $S$ which converges to $0$ in norm but not pointwise.


Proof. As below, define $$\Lambda_j x=x_j\quad(x=(x_1,x_2,\dots))$$and note that what we need to prove is that there exists $j$ such that $\Lambda_j$ is not bounded. Suppose each $\Lambda_j$ is bounded, and define $x=(x_1,\dots)$ by $$x_j=j||\Lambda_j||.$$Then $$\Lambda_jx=j||\Lambda_j||,$$hence $$||x||\ge j$$for  every $j$, contradiction. 
(Of course this doesn't quite answer the question unless we know that there is a norm on $S$. In case it's not clear,  if $V$ is any real or complex vector space there exists a norm on $V$. For example, say $B$ is a basis, and define $||\sum_{j=1}^n\alpha_jb_j||=\sum|\alpha_j|$ for any $b_1,\dots b_n\in B$ and scalars $\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n$.)
I'm leaving the original version here, because to my way of thinking a Banach-space norm on  $\ell_\infty$ such that convergence in norm does not imply pointwise convergence is more interesting/surprising than the above:

Unimportant comment on jargon: I may well be mistaken, but  if I'm  not then the phrase "sequence space" is often defined in a way that explicitly rules out this behavior.
(Of course that comment applies in a context where "a sequence space" is a particular sort of Banach space)
Anyway, one can "construct" such a thing using AC - it's an interesting question whether AC is needed.
Let  $X=\ell_\infty$. Say $T:X\to X$ is linear and bijective, and $T^{-1}$ is not bounded (with respect to the usual norm). (You can easily construct such $T$ if you have a Hamel basis for  $\ell_\infty$.)
Define $$||x||_X=||Tx||_\infty.$$
Define $$\Lambda_jx=x_j\quad(x=(x_1,x_2,\dots)).$$
We're done if there exists $j$ such that $\Lambda_j$ is not bounded (with respect to $||\cdot||_X$). Suppose to the contrary that every $\Lambda_j$ is bounded. Now, for every $x\in X$ we have $$\sup_j|\Lambda _j x|=||x||_\infty<\infty.$$So Banach-Steinhaus (uniform boundedness) shows that $||\Lambda_j||$ is bounded; say $||\Lambda_j||\le C$ for every $j$. This says precisely that $$||x||_\infty\le C||x||_X=C||Tx||_\infty,$$so $T^{-1}$ is bounded (with respect to the sup norm), contradiction.
A: The key thing to understand is that $\mathbb{F}^\omega$ is just some vector space of dimension $2^{\aleph_0}$.  As such, it is isomorphic to any other vector space of dimension $2^{\aleph_0}$, which includes (for instance) any separable infinite-dimensional Banach space whatsoever.  So, to construct a norm on $\mathbb{F}^\omega$, we don't have to explicitly write down a norm on sequences; we can just write down a norm on a totally different-looking vector space which happens to be isomorphic.
So, for instance, let $(x^{(n)})$ be any sequence of linearly independent elements of $\mathbb{F}^\omega$ which do not converge to $0$ pointwise.  Pick your favorite separable infinite-dimensional Banach space $X$ with a sequence of linearly independent elements $(y^{(n)})$ which converge to $0$.  Then there exists a vector space isomorphism $f:\mathbb{F}^\omega\to X$ which maps $x^{(n)}$ to $y^{(n)}$ for each $n$.  Transporting the norm of $X$ along $f$, we get a norm on $\mathbb{F}^{\omega}$ such that $x^{(n)}\to 0$.
Alternatively, we could pick a Hamel basis for $\mathbb{F}^\omega$ which contains each $x^{(n)}$, and then define the norm explicitly in terms of the Hamel basis (for instance, we could use the $\ell^\infty$ norm for that basis, except with the $x^{(n)}$ coordinates scaled so that $x^{(n)}\to 0$).  This is again the same idea: a Hamel basis gives us an isomorphism $\mathbb{F}^\omega\cong\bigoplus_I\mathbb{F}$ for some set $I$, and a norm is very easy to define on $\bigoplus_I\mathbb{F}$ since every element has only finitely many nonzero coordinates (so for instance, any of the usual $\ell^p$ sequence norms are always finite).
