Let $E$ be a $\mathbb R$-Banach space and $(T(t))_{t\ge0}$ be a semigroup on $E$, i.e. $T(t)$ is a bounded linear operator on $E$ for all $t\ge0$, $T(0)=\operatorname{id}_E$ and $$T(s+t)=T(s)T(t)\;\;\;\text{for all }s,t\ge0.\tag1$$ Let $$\operatorname{orb}x:[0,\infty)\to E\;,\;\;\;t\mapsto T(t)x$$ for $x\in E$, $$\mathcal D(A):=\left\{x\in E:\operatorname{orb}x\text{ is right-differentiable at }0\right\}$$ and $$Ax:=(\operatorname{orb}x)'(0)\;\;\;\text{for }x\in\mathcal D(A).$$

How can we show that $(T(t))_{t\ge0}$ is strongly continuous on $\overline{\mathcal D(A)}$?

By the semigroup property, it should suffice to show strong continuity at $0$. Moreover, by density it should suffice to consider $x\in\mathcal D(A)$. Now, my usual reflex would be to obtain the claim from the identity $$T(t)x-x=\int_0^tT(s)Ax\:{\rm d}s\;\;\;\text{for all }t\ge0\tag2$$ which is valid for any strongly continuous semigroup and its generator. However, with strong continuity being the property we're asked to prove, I don't see why $(2)$ should hold (actually, I don't see why the Riemann integral should exist in that case).

So, what do we need to do?

I think that we need to assume that $(T(t))_{t\ge0}$ is locally bounded (e.g. quasicontractive), i.e. $$\sup_{s\in[0,\:t]}\left\|T(s)\right\|_{\mathfrak L(E)}<\infty\;\;\;\text{for all }t\ge0\tag3.$$ Under that assumption we obtain $$\sup_{s\in[0,\:t]}\left\|\frac{T(s+h)x-T(s)x}h-T(s)Ax\right\|_E\le\sup_{s\in[0,\:t]}\left\|T(s)\right\|_{\mathfrak L(E)}\left\|\frac{T(h)x-x}h-Ax\right\|_E\xrightarrow{h\to0+}0\tag4$$ for all $t\ge0$ and hence locally uniform right-differentiability of $\operatorname{orb}x$. Maybe we can build up on that.


You are right that it suffices to show strong continuity at $0$ (by the semigroup property), but it is not true that it is enough to check strong continuity at $0$ for $x\in D(A)$. You would need some uniform bound here. On the other hand, right-differentiability at $0$ automatically implies right-continuity at $0$: If $T_t x-x$ does not tend to zero, then there is no chance for the limit $\frac 1 t(T_t x-x)$ to exist.

In your situation, strong continuity on $\overline{D(A)}$ is equivalent to local boundedness on $\overline{D(A)}$. One implication follows directly from the uniform boundedness principle and the semigroup property. For the other implication (the one you ask about), let $x\in\overline{D(A)}$ and $(x_n)$ a sequence in $D(A)$ such that $x_n\to x$. Then $$ \|T(t)x-x\|\leq \sup_{s\in[0,T]}\|T(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}(\overline{D(A)})}\|x-x_n\|+\|T_t x_n-x_n\|+\|x-x_n\|. $$ Letting first $t\to 0$ and then $n\to\infty$ yields the desired convergence.

  • $\begingroup$ It's not important for the question, but your notation suggests that $T(s)\overline{\mathcal D(A)}\subseteq\overline{\mathcal D(A)}$ for all $s\ge0$. Why is that the case? $\endgroup$ – 0xbadf00d Feb 4 at 12:16
  • $\begingroup$ Well, $T(s)$ maps $D(A)$ into $D(A)$ (this can be proven without strong continuity), and then continuity of $T(s)$ implies that the same is true for the closure. $\endgroup$ – MaoWao Feb 4 at 13:36
  • $\begingroup$ From your proof I guess that's sufficient if there is a small $T>0$ such that the operator norms on $[0,T)$ are bounded, right? $\endgroup$ – 0xbadf00d Feb 4 at 13:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That is right. You can also directly show that boundedness on $[0,T)$ for some $T>0$ implies boundedness on all bounded intervals: If $I$ is bounded, then there exists $n\in\mathbb{N}$ such that $t/n<T$ for $t\in I$. Then $\|T(t)\|\leq\|T(t/n)\|^n$ by the semigroup property. $\endgroup$ – MaoWao Feb 4 at 13:45
  • $\begingroup$ Do we even obtain left-differentiability of the orbits? $\endgroup$ – 0xbadf00d Feb 9 at 16:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.