1
$\begingroup$

Let $V$ be a real oriented $d$-dimensional inner product space, $d \ge 3$. For $1 \le k \le d-1$, the Hodge dual map $\star: \bigwedge^k V \to \bigwedge^{d-k} V$ commutes with orientation-preserving isometries:

For every $Q \in \text{SO}(V)$, we have $$\star \circ \bigwedge^k Q= \bigwedge^{d-k} Q \circ \star \tag{1}.$$

Is $\star$ the unique linear map $\bigwedge^k V \to \bigwedge^{d-k} V$ satisfying $(1)$ up to scaling?

In the language of representation theory, I ask if the space of equivariant maps w.r.t the natural representations of $ \text{SO}(V)$ on $\bigwedge^k V,\bigwedge^{d-k} V$ is one dimensional.


In $d=2$, $\star:V \to V$ is of course not the unique map up to scaling which commutes with all isometries, since $\text{SO}(2)$ is commutative, we have additional elements... (This is why I restricted $d \ge 3$).

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

This is true unless $d$ is even and $k=d-k=\frac{d}2$. This follows directly from the representation theory description you give in the question using Schur's lemma. Unless $d$ is even and $k=\frac{d}2$ the representation $\Lambda^kV$ is irreducible and so the isomorphism to $\Lambda^{d-k}V$ is unique up to a scalar multiple.If $d$ is even and $k=\frac{d}2$, then $\Lambda^kV$ is the direct sum of two non-isomorphic irreducible representations (the two eigenspaces of $*$) and you can choose independently choose sclalar factors on the two components (so there is a two parameter family of homomorphisms).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. Do you have a reference for these facts? (The irreducibility of $\bigwedge^k V$ for $k \neq d/2$ and the direct sum decomposition in the case $k=d/2$). Also, in the case where $d$ is not a multiple of $4$, the eigenvalues of $\star$ are $\pm i$, so the maps $\omega \to \omega^+,\omega \to \omega^-$ are not real. Doesn't this create problems, if we restrict the discussion to the real case? (which is what I asked about). Thank you for your help and patience...I am weak on representation theory. $\endgroup$ – Asaf Shachar Jan 30 at 15:04
  • $\begingroup$ You are right about the real vs. complex issue, I wasn't careful enough there. In a real setting uniqueness indeed holds unless $d$ is a multiple of $4$. You can certainly find the results in the complex case in Fulton-Harris. They are fundamental for the representation theory of SO and $\mathfrak{so}$ since these are the so-called fundamental representations. So they should show up whethever the representation theory of orthogonal groups and algebras is discussed. $\endgroup$ – Andreas Cap Jan 31 at 8:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.