0
$\begingroup$

I am stuck in proving two parts of this proof.

Let $U$ be the open set in question. Then, for all $x \in U$, since $U$ is open in $\mathbb{R}^n$, we can build an open ball $B(r,x)$ around $x$ with $r>0$, and construct an $n$-rectangle denoted $R_x = (a_1,b_1)\times \cdots \times (a_n,b_n)$ contained inside $B(r,x)$ where $a_i, b_i \in \mathbb{Q}$ for all $i \in [n]$ since $\mathbb{Q}$ is dense in $\mathbb{R}$.

One part I have problems with is how can I rigorously prove that

$$\bigcup_{x\in U} R_x = U$$

and that there is a countable number of rectangles using the fact that all my points $a_i,b_i$ are rational?

Thank you!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ For all $x$ $R_x \subset U$, then $\cup R_x \subset U$. And there is at most countably many of $R_x$s $\endgroup$ – dEmigOd Jan 25 at 8:54
  • $\begingroup$ I already stated that in my question. My problem is how to prove it? Or is it evident with what I've got already? $\endgroup$ – The Bosco Jan 25 at 9:00
  • $\begingroup$ $\forall x \in U \exists R_x : x \in R_x \Rightarrow \forall x \in U x \in \cup R_x \Rightarrow U \subset \cup R_x$ - this gives the equality. Countability comes from knowing the cardinality of $\mathbb{Q}^n$ $\endgroup$ – dEmigOd Jan 25 at 9:02
  • $\begingroup$ but for example, in $\mathbb{R}$ you could argue this because the subset $U$ is a disjoint countable union of intervals. Therefore, you could argue that each one of them has a unique rational number, but you can't do that in $\mathbb{R}^n$ for $n>1$ since now the rectangles have to overlap (although not completely). $\endgroup$ – The Bosco Jan 25 at 9:06
  • $\begingroup$ nothing in the claim suggests boxes should be disjoint, why bother? $\endgroup$ – dEmigOd Jan 25 at 9:14
1
$\begingroup$

As $R_x\subseteq U$ for all $x \in U,$ we have $\bigcup_{x\in U} R_x \subseteq U.$ Now if $x$ is any point in $U,$ then $x\in R_x \subseteq \bigcup_{x\in U} R_x.$ Thus $$ \bigcup_{x\in U} R_x = U. $$

There is only a countable number of rectangles with coordinates in $\mathbb{Q}^n$ as $\mathbb{Q}^n$ is countable, as is normally shown using Cantor's diagonal argument.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.