2
$\begingroup$

Let $\Gamma$ be a compact $C^2$ manifold and suppose that $f_n$ is a non negative sequence of functions such that ${\vert \vert f_n \vert \vert}_{L^{\infty}(0,T,L^1(\Gamma))} \le C$

I am interested in deducing convergence of $f_n$

MY ATTEMPTS:

  1. Since $L^1$ is not reflexive, $L^{\infty}(0,T,L^1(\Gamma))$ is also not reflexive and thus from the boundedness of $f_n$ I can't obtain a weak convergent subsequence.
  2. After that, I wondered if I could have a weak-* convergence so I thought the Banach-Alaoglu theorem. But again, this didn't work because I couldn't find the Banach and separable space whose dual is $L^{\infty}(0,T,L^1(\Gamma))$

2nd EDIT: I just came up with the following idea for which I need also verification:

Consider the space of continuous functions with compact support on $\Gamma$, i.e $C_c(\Gamma)$. Since $\Gamma$ is compact, we know that $C_c(\Gamma)$ is also Banach and separable. Its dual space is the space of (signed) Radon measures on $\Gamma$ with finite mass which is denoted by $\mathcal M(\Gamma)$.

If $L^{\infty}(0,T,\mathcal M(\Gamma))$ is contained in the dual space of $L^1(0,T,\mathcal C_c(\Gamma))$ then by Banach-Alaoglu theorem a weak-* convergent subsequence is obtained.

However I'm not completely sure if the duality argument that I used holds.

At this point I've been stuck. I would really appreciate any help or even hints.

Thanks in advance!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ If it were $L^\infty(\Omega)$, where $\Omega$ is a $\sigma$-finite measure space, then $L^\infty$-boundedness would give you the existence of a subsequence that converges weakly-$\star$. Surely there is a version of this result for the spaces you are working with. (I see that you added this in your edit. Try looking in these lecture notes of John Hunter: $\endgroup$ – Giuseppe Negro Jan 23 at 12:24
  • $\begingroup$ @GiuseppeNegro I just edited my question with a possible solution (?)...Could you please tell me your opinion? $\endgroup$ – kaithkolesidou Jan 23 at 12:26
  • $\begingroup$ math.stackexchange.com/a/1717522/8157 $\endgroup$ – Giuseppe Negro Jan 23 at 12:27
  • $\begingroup$ I think that what you did is OK. $\endgroup$ – Giuseppe Negro Jan 23 at 12:28
  • $\begingroup$ @GiuseppeNegro My only doubt is if $\mathcal M(\Gamma)$ is a separable space in order for the duality argument to be valid. I saw in your answer in that post you recommend a book in evolution equations. I'll chech it now. Thanks a lot $\endgroup$ – kaithkolesidou Jan 23 at 12:32
1
$\begingroup$

The dual space of $L^1(0,T; C(\Gamma))$ is $L^\infty_w(0,T;\mathcal M(\Gamma))$ and this space consists of weak-$*$ measurable functions, see, e.g., Theorem 10.1.16 in "Handbook of applied analysis" by Papageorgiou and Kyritsi-Yiallourou.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Exactly what I was looking for! Thanks a lot for your help! $\endgroup$ – kaithkolesidou Jan 24 at 10:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.