0
$\begingroup$

I hope you can give me some tips on how to translate part of the following sentence into predicate logic:

“No woman loves a man that loves multiple women”.

Which quantifier would you use to express the part “multiple”? It of course means “more than one”, so the existential quantifier (expressing: at least one) as such does not seem enough... Any ideas?

Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ "more than one" is "at least two". $\endgroup$ – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Jan 22 '19 at 15:38
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, yes I agree, but then my question becomes: how do I express that? Sorry, just starting out with predicate logic, so maybe the answer should be obvious... $\endgroup$ – user637252 Jan 22 '19 at 16:36
0
$\begingroup$

Rephrase that part as

There are two different women loved by the man

$\exists x\exists y:$ Woman$(x)\, \land\,$Woman$(y)\, \land\, \lnot(x=y)\,\land\,$Love$(m,x)\, \land\,$Love$(m, y)$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I would instead write $\exists x,y\in\text{Women}$, but it's the same concept. $\endgroup$ – Don Thousand Jan 22 '19 at 16:01
  • $\begingroup$ thanks! that makes sense! $\endgroup$ – user637252 Jan 22 '19 at 16:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.