1
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

Going off the axioms, I'm trying to determine how to verify each of these. In the first set, do I take $u = (x_1, x_2, x_3)$ and $v = (y_1, y_2, y_3)$, or would it rather be $u = (x_1 + y_1, x_2 + y_2, x_3 + y_3), v = (x_4 + y_4, x_5 + y_5, x_6 + y_6)$?

Based on what I know about scalar multiplication, I would say the first set is not a vector space because $0(x_1, x_2, x_3)$ = $(0, 0, 0)$ which is not equivalent to $(0x_1, x_2, x_3)$, for non-zero values of $x_2$ and $x_3$. The second and third sets seem to define vector spaces, as I can't seem to figure out any axiom that directly fails (i.e. $u+v$ is in $V$, a unique additive identity exists, and the set is closed under scalar multiplication). Any help would be appreciated.

Edit: The third set is not a vector space.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

The third one is not a vector space. The zero vector in this space is $(-1,-1)$ but if you multiply this by $2$ you don't get back the zero vector.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Ahh thank you! My Linear Algebra is very rusty right now, so these problems are helping me refresh. For the first set, what would you set the $u$ and $v$ vectors as when checking for $u+v$ $\endgroup$ Jan 22 '19 at 5:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @SanjoyTheManjoy In the first example all properties of addition are satisfied. It is teh scalar multiplication (and its relation to addition) that is a problem. $\endgroup$ Jan 22 '19 at 5:51
  • $\begingroup$ Right, I figured as much, but to verify that axiom of addition holds, do I let u = $(x_1, x_2, x_3)$ or rather u = $(x_1 + y_1,...)$ $\endgroup$ Jan 22 '19 at 5:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.