1
$\begingroup$

Question: Let $E$ be an algebraically closed extension field of a field $F$. Show that the algebraic closure $\bar F_E$ of $F$ in $E$ is algebraically closed.


Firstly, I conclude a thing, if $\bar F_E$ is properly contained in $E$, then it couldn't be algebraically closed, since an algebraically closed field cannot be properly contained. Therefore my idea is to prove $\bar F_E=E$.
Then I notice that $E$ is algebraically closed, then for each polynomial $f(x)\in E[x]$, it can be split completely into linear factors: $$f(x)=(x-\alpha_1)\cdots(x-\alpha_n)\quad\text{ for $\alpha_i\in E$, $i=1,2,\cdots,n$. }$$ But since $\bar F_E\leq E$ obviously, the remaining things to prove is $E\leq \bar F_E$, so I want to choose an element $\alpha\in E$, and I want to prove it is algebraic over $F$, but I cannot find any connection between this and the completely factorization of $f(x)$. Any suggestion?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Are you assuming $E$ is an algebraic extension of $F$? $\endgroup$ – Eclipse Sun Jan 21 at 0:51
  • $\begingroup$ @EclipseSun I think no, it is the assumption of the question to make me think to that direction of proving. Is it $\bar F_E$ cannot properly contained in $E$ a wrong idea? $\endgroup$ – kelvin hong 方 Jan 21 at 0:58
  • $\begingroup$ An algebraically closed field, for example $\mathbb{C}$ can be properly contained in another algebraically closed field, if you allow that extension to be transcendental. $\endgroup$ – Eclipse Sun Jan 21 at 1:03
  • $\begingroup$ But isn't that all transcendental numbers are already in $\mathbb R$ hence in $\mathbb C$? I never heard before $\mathbb C$ can be properly contained in other field. Wow! $\endgroup$ – kelvin hong 方 Jan 21 at 1:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ $\mathbb{C}$ is contained in $\mathbb{C}(x)$, the field of rational functions on $\mathbb{C}$. $\endgroup$ – Eclipse Sun Jan 21 at 1:13
1
$\begingroup$

Let $F$ be a field. An extension $K/F$ is called an algebraic closure of $F$ if $K$ is algebraically closed and $K/F$ is an algebraic extension.

As @EclipseSun mentioned in the comment section, an algebraically closed field can be properly contained in another algebraically closed field.

Define $$\overline{F}_E=\{a\in E\mid a \;\text{is algebraic over $F $}\}.$$

Clearly $\overline{F}_E$ is algebraic over $F$.

Let $\alpha$ be a root of $f(x)\in \overline{F}_E[x]$. Then $\overline{F}_E(\alpha) $ is algebraic over $\overline{F}_E$ and $\overline{F}_E$ is algebraic over $F$. Hence $\overline{F}_E(\alpha)$ is algebraic over $F$(why?). So $\alpha\in \overline{F}_E$, since $\alpha $ is algebraic over $F$. Hence $\overline{F}_E$ is algebraically closed.

We need to show that $\overline{F}_E$ is actually a field. In other words, if $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are algebraic over $F $, then $\alpha+\beta,\alpha-\beta, \alpha\cdot\beta,\frac\alpha\beta(\beta\neq0)$ are algebraic over $F$. This is easy to prove if you recall that $F(\alpha,\beta)=F(\alpha)(\beta)$ and $\alpha$ is algebraic over $F$ iff $F(\alpha)/F $ is finite. I hope you can take this from here.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you, the only thing I missed is the part $\bar F_E(\alpha)$ is algebraic over $F$ implies $\alpha\in\bar F_E$. After filling up this part the solution is completed. $\endgroup$ – kelvin hong 方 Jan 21 at 7:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.