6
$\begingroup$

Let $X $ be a compact topological space (not necessarilly Hausdorff). I am looking for a charactrization for the following property:

Property: If $C $ is a closed subset of $X $, then there are pairwise disjoint closed subsets $C_1$,...,$C_n $ of $X $ such that $C=C_1\cup\dots\cup C_n $, and each $C_i $ has the property that if $A $ is a clopen subest of $C_i $, then there exists a clopen subset $B $ of $X $ with $A=C_i\cap B$?

Any comment is very welcome.

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ The spaces that every closed subset has finitely many connected components are example of such spaces. $\endgroup$ – E.Rostami Jan 16 at 17:21
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Well, in the case that $X$ is Hausdorff, this is equivalent to total disconnectedness. $\endgroup$ – Eric Wofsey Jan 16 at 19:02
  • $\begingroup$ By “clopen subset of $C_i$”, you surely mean “subset clopen w.r.t. the subspace topology of $C_i$”? $\endgroup$ – Lukas Juhrich Jan 16 at 22:29
  • $\begingroup$ @Luke, yes in the subspace topology. $\endgroup$ – Andy.G Jan 17 at 2:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Neither direction is obvious; I'm writing an answer elaborating now. $\endgroup$ – Eric Wofsey Jan 17 at 2:51
3
$\begingroup$

I don't see any reason to believe there is a simpler necessary and sufficient condition in general. When $X$ is Hausdorff there is one, though: your condition is equivalent to $X$ being totally disconnected.

To prove this, first suppose $X$ is compact Hausdorff and totally disconnected. Then clopen sets separate points of $X$ (see Any two points in a Stone space can be disconnected by clopen sets). It follows by compactness that clopen sets also separate closed sets (the proof is the same as the proof that a compact Hausdorff space is normal, just using clopen sets instead of open sets everywhere). So in particular, if $C\subseteq X$ is closed and $A$ is clopen in $C$, then $A$ and $C\setminus A$ can be separated by clopen subsets of $X$ (since they are disjoint and closed in $X$). This means that your condition holds, with $n=1$.

Conversely, suppose $X$ is compact Hausdorff and not totally disconnected. Your property is inherited by closed subspaces, so we may replace $X$ with one of its nontrivial connected components. So, we assume $X$ is compact Hausdorff and connected and has more than one point, and must show it does not satisfy your condition.

To prove this, pick an infinite discrete subset $D\subset X$ (see Every infinite Hausdorff space has an infinite discrete subspace) and consider $C=\overline{D}$. Suppose a decomposition $C=C_1\cup\dots\cup C_n$ with your property existed. Note that each point of $D$ is isolated in $C$, and some $C_i$ must contain infinitely many points of $D$. In particular, some $C_i$ must be disconnected, so there is a nontrivial clopen subset $A\subset C_i$. But $X$ is connected, so it has no nontrivial clopen subsets, and so $A$ cannot be $B\cap C_i$ for any clopen $B\subseteq X$.


Of course, total disconnectedness is not necessary in the non-Hausdorff case (I don't know whether it is sufficient). Besides trivial examples like the indiscrete topology, there is also the cofinite topology on any set. More generally, as Es.Ro commented, a sufficient condition is that every closed subset of $X$ has only finitely many connected components, since then you can take the connected components as the $C_i$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer. $\endgroup$ – Andy.G Jan 17 at 3:00
  • $\begingroup$ Can we find a special family $F $ of closed subsets of $X $ (in non Hausdorff case) such that if each element of $F $ has a partition with the stated property, then all close subsets of $X $ have a partition with the stated property? $\endgroup$ – Andy.G Jan 17 at 14:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.