I want to calculate $E(\text{min}(X_1,X_2,X_3))$ where $X_1\sim\text{exp}(1), \ X_2\sim\text{exp}(2)$ and $X_3\sim\text{exp}(3).$

Denote $M=\text{min}(X_1,X_2,X_3)$. By independence of the $X_i$ we have that

\begin{align} F_M(t)&=\mathbb{P}(M\leq t)=1-\mathbb{P}(M>t)=1-\mathbb{P}(X_1>t)\mathbb{P}(X_2>t)\mathbb{P}(X_3>t)=1-e^{-6t}, \end{align}

thus $f_M(t)=F_M'(t)=6e^{-6t}\implies E(M)=1/6$.


Why isn't it the case that

\begin{align} F_M(t)&=\mathbb{P}(M\leq t)=\mathbb{P}(X_1\leq t)\mathbb{P}(X_2\leq t)\mathbb{P}(X_3\leq t)=(1-e^{-x})(1-e^{-2x})(1-e^{-3x})\\ &=... ? \end{align}

Why do I have to use the complement rule?

  • $\begingroup$ Why the wrong title? $\endgroup$ – Did Jan 15 at 23:03
  • $\begingroup$ @Did - I'm sorry I'm a bit tired now. I don't see what you're refering to? $\endgroup$ – Parseval Jan 15 at 23:05
  • $\begingroup$ What was your title and what is it now that I have corrected it? Tired or not... $\endgroup$ – Did Jan 15 at 23:07
  • $\begingroup$ @Did - Ah yes, the reason for that was because this is just a part of an assignment regarding Poisson distributed arrivals and I made a typo. I apologize that my lack of focus at this hour is causing you discontent and wasting your time. I'll better myself and triple-read my future posts before I submit them. $\endgroup$ – Parseval Jan 15 at 23:31

Because $\Bbb{P}(M\leq t) \neq \Bbb{P}(X_1 \leq t)\Bbb{P}(X_2 \leq t)\Bbb{P}(X_3 \leq t)$. Indeed - if $X_1 \leq t$ but $X_2 > t$ and $X_3 > t$ then we still have $M \leq t$.

However, it is not too hard to see that $\min(X_1,X_2,X_3) > t \iff X_1, X_2, X_3 > t$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.