5
$\begingroup$

An $n$-dimensional (closed) pseudomanifold is a finite simplicial complex $X$ such that

(i) every simplex is a face of an $n$-simplex

(ii) every $(n-1)$-simplex is a face of exactly two $n$-simplices

(iii) Given any two $n$-simplices $\sigma, \tau \in X$ there is a sequence of $n$-simplices $\sigma_0 = \sigma, \ldots, \sigma_k = \tau$ such that $\sigma_i \cap \sigma_{i+1}$ is an $(n-1)$-dimensional simplex for each $0 \leq i \leq k-1$.

These conditions imply that the polyhedron of a pseudomanifold is path-connected. Is it true that if a finite simplicial complex $X$ satisfies (i) and (ii) and has a path-connected polyhedron then it satisfies (iii)?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Just as an idea for a proof that its true, suppose you take a path connecting vertices for two simplices $\sigma$ and $\tau$. This path is homotopic to a path which transverses only simplex edges and vertices. I believe that if you can prove that the star of any vertex (the simplices that intersect that vertex) is a Pseudomanifold then you can prove that there exists a chain between $\sigma$ and $\tau$ as you describe. $\endgroup$ – Eric Haengel Feb 18 '13 at 18:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Simplicial stuff"? $\endgroup$ – Neal Feb 18 '13 at 20:40
  • $\begingroup$ @Neal Yeah, that tag rubs me the wrong way every time I see it. This is not OP's decision, the tag has been used for a while. It was criticized in the past. I personally feel that the simple (simplicial-) would be better. $\endgroup$ – user53153 Feb 18 '13 at 22:39
4
$\begingroup$

Counterexample with $n=2$: let $X$ be the union of two hollow tetrahedra joined at a vertex. Here (i) and (ii) hold; (iii) fails, yet $X$ is path-connected.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.