This will get buried, but it's worth noting that given a (not necessarily complete) normed field $\mathbb{K}$, a natural $\text{n}$, an $\text{n}$-tuple $\left(\lambda_{0},\dots,\lambda_{\text{n}-1}\right)\in\mathbb{K}^{\text{n}}$ with entries of norm $<1$, and a polynomial $\Phi\in\mathbb{K}\left[x_{0},\dots,x_{\text{n}-1}\right]$, there's a general, finite (with complexity bounded by a function of the degree(s) of $\Phi$) formula that computes $$\underbrace{\sum_{x_{0}=0}^{\infty}\cdots\sum_{x_{\text{n}-1}=0}^{\infty}}_{\text{n sums}}\Phi\left(x_{0},\dots,x_{\text{n}-1}\right)\prod_{\text{i}=0}^{\text{n-1}} \lambda_{\text{i}}^{x_{\text{i}}}$$ as an element of $\mathbb{K}$. (So that the sum in particular converges absolutely—even if $\mathbb{K}$ fails to be complete!) The ideas behind its derivation are simple, but to avoid drowning ourselves in notation, let us first assume some (un-)conventions:
In what follows,
$\colon$ is shorthand for $\in$.
$\to$ forms the set of functions.
$\omega$ is the set of naturals (including $0$).
Each natural $\text{n}\colon\omega$ is identified with the set $\left\{0,\dots,\text{n}-1\right\}$.
Henceforth fix a normed field $\mathbb{K}$ and a natural $\text{n}$. (Everything we do in general will be motivated by the specialization of the argument that follows in the case that $\text{n}=1$.)
The set $\text{n}\to\omega$ is simultaneously identified with the evident set of such functions and the set of $\text{n}$-tuples of naturals (so that the two are in particular identified with one another in the evident way).
Given $c\colon\omega$, the tuple/function $c\colon \text{n}\to\omega$ is by definition the function that evaluates to $c$ everywhere.
Given $\mathscr{k}\colon\mathbb{K}$, the tuple/function $\mathscr{k}\colon \text{n}\to\omega$ is by definition the function that evaluates to $\mathscr{k}$ everywhere.
Given $\text{i}\colon\text{n}$, the tuple/function $1_{\text{i}}\colon \text{n}\to\omega$ is by definition the function that evaluates to $1$ at $\text{i}$ and $0$ elsewhere.
The addition of elements of $\text{n}\to\omega$ and the addition and subtraction of elements of $\text{n}\to\mathbb{K}$ is defined pointwise as usual.
Given a polynomial $\Phi\colon\mathbb{K}\left[x_{\text{i}}\right]_{\text{i}\colon\text{n}}$ and an element $x\colon\text{n}\to\omega$, the evaluation $\Phi\left(x\right)\colon\mathbb{K}$ is defined as $\Phi\left(x\left(\text{i}\right)\right)_{\text{i}\colon\text{n}}$ (so that, somewhat confusing notation, $\Phi$ is identified with a particular function $\Phi\colon\left(\text{n}\to\omega\right)\to\mathbb{K}$).
$\leq$ denotes the standard (product) partial order on $\text{n}\colon\omega$ when applied between elements thereof.
Given $\text{i}\colon\text{n}$, $\preccurlyeq_{\text{i}}$ denotes the total preorder on $\text{n}\colon\omega$ induced (from the standard total order on $\omega$) by evaluation at $\text{i}$.
Given $\lambda\colon\text{n}\to\mathbb{K}$ and $x\colon\text{n}\to\omega$, define the expoential $\lambda^{x}:=\prod_{\text{i}\colon\text{n}}\lambda\left(\text{i}\right)^{x\left(\text{i}\right)}$.
In analogy to the above, we might consider $\mathbb{K}\left[x_{\text{i}}\right]_{\text{i}\colon\text{n}}$ to be the free $\mathbb{K}$-vector space on $\left(x^{d}\right)_{d\colon\text{n}\to\omega}$, where $x^{d}$ is a shorthand for $\prod_{\text{i}\colon\text{n}}x_{\text{i}}^{d\left(\text{i}\right)}$.
Given $d\colon\text{n}\to\omega$, the function $\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\colon\left(\text{n}\to\omega\right)\to\mathbb{K}$ is defined so that $\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x\right):=\prod_{\text{i}\colon\text{n}}\tbinom{x\left(\text{i}\right)}{d\left(\text{i}\right)}$. (I.e., as a product of binomial coefficients. Note that the outputs of $\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}$ are all in the image of the canonical map $\omega\to\mathbb{K}$.)
Given $\text{i}\colon\text{n}$, the operator $$\text{S}_{\text{i}}\ \colon\ \left(\left(\text{n}\to\omega\right)\to\mathbb{K}\right)\to \left(\left(\text{n}\to\omega\right)\to\mathbb{K}\right)$$ is defined to map as $$\text{S}_{\text{i}}\ \colon\ \Psi\ \mapsto\ \left(x\ \mapsto\ \Psi\left(x+1_{\text{i}}\right)\right)\text{.}$$
Given $d\colon\text{n}\to\omega$, the operators $\text{S}^{d},\ \mathfrak{D}^{d}\colon \left(\left(\text{n}\to\omega\right)\to\mathbb{K}\right)\to \left(\left(\text{n}\to\omega\right)\to\mathbb{K}\right)$ are defined as $\text{S}^{d}:=\prod_{\text{i}\colon\text{n}} \text{S}_{\text{i}}^{d\left(\text{i}\right)}$ and $\mathfrak{D}^{d}:=\prod_{\text{i}\colon\text{n}}\left(\text{S}_{\text{i}}^{d\left(\text{i}\right)}-1\right)$ respectively. (Here the product denotes composition of (commuting) operators and $1\colon\left(\left(\text{n}\to\omega\right)\to\mathbb{K}\right)\to \left(\left(\text{n}\to\omega\right)\to\mathbb{K}\right)$ is the identity.)
Given $\Psi\colon\left(\text{n}\to\omega\right)\to\mathbb{K}$, the subset $\mathfrak{d}\left(\psi\right) \subseteq \text{n}\to\omega$ is defined to entail precisely those $d\colon\text{n}\to\omega$ for which $\mathfrak{D}^{d}\Psi\left(0\right)\neq 0$.
Also, every infinite sum in question will converge absolutely unless otherwise specified (i.e., wrt the net of finite subsets of the infinite indexing set over which it is taken), so we largely ignore analytic subtleties below.
In the above terms, the original question asks to compute $$\sum_{x\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\Phi\left(x\right)\lambda^{x}\text{,}$$ and we claim that given $\Phi\colon\mathbb{K}\left[x_{\text{i}}\right]_{\text{i}\colon\text{n}}$ and $\lambda\colon\text{n}\to\mathbb{K}$ with outputs of norm $<1$, $$\sum_{x\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\Phi\left(x\right)\lambda^{x}\ =\ \sum_{d\colon\ \mathfrak{d}\left(\Phi\right)}\sum_{d'\ \leq\ d}\left(-1\right)^{d-d'}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d'}\left(d\right)\Phi\left(d'\right)\frac{\lambda^{d}}{\left(1-\lambda\right)^{d+1}}\text{,}$$ with $\mathfrak{d}\left(\Phi\right)$ a priori finite. (Actually, we prove something marginally stronger but in "practice" easier to work with, namely that the identity holds with the $\mathfrak{d}\left(\Phi\right)$ in the index of the first sum replaced with any finite superset thereof.)
Some fundamental/useful input from the discrete calculus
The crucial observations, essentially amounting to the multivariate discrete calculus, are that as follows:
Proposition: Given $\Xi\ \colon\left(\text{n}\to\omega\right)\to\mathbb{K}$, the sum $$\sum_{d\colon\text{n}\to\omega}\Xi\left(d\right)\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x\right)$$ stabilizes in finitely many summands (not necessarily uniformly) at each argument $x\colon\text{n}\to\omega$, and so evaluates to a well-defined function $\left(\text{n}\to\omega\right)\to\mathbb{K}$.
Proof: In fact, $\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x\right)$ is nonzero i(f)f $x\geq d$ (by the elementary properties of binomial coefficients), and thus for a given $x$ only finitely many of the summands are nonzero, as claimed. $\Box$
Proposition: Given $\Psi\colon\left(\text{n}\to\omega\right)\to\mathbb{K}$, there exists $\Xi\ \colon\left(\text{n}\to\omega\right)\to\mathbb{K}$ such that $$\Psi\left(x\right)\ =\ \sum_{d\colon\text{n}\to\omega}\Xi\left(d\right)\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x\right)$$ in the above sense.
Proof: Fix a linearization (i.e., to the order isomorphism type of the standard well-order on $\omega$) $\tilde{\leq}$ extending the usual partial order $\leq$ on $\text{n}\to\omega$ (such $\tilde{\leq}$ exists by a standard explicit construction, e.g., the total-degree-then-lexicographical order). Then (by the elementary properties of binomial coefficients), if $d\tilde{\geq} x$, $$\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},x}\left(x\right)\ =\ \begin{cases} 1\text{ if }d=x \\ 0\text{ otherwise}\end{cases}\text{.}$$ Thus we can build up our desired $\Xi$ inductively with respect to $\tilde{\leq}$ beginning with its minimal element (namely $0$), at each step choosing $$\Xi\left(x\right)\ =\ \Psi\left(x\right)-\sum_{d\tilde{<}x}\Xi\left(d\right)\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x\right)\text{,}$$ leaving the values of $\Xi\left(x'\right)$ unaffected for $x'\tilde{<}x$. $\Box$
Proposition: Given $d_{0},d_{1}\colon\text{n}\to\omega$, $$\mathfrak{D}^{d_{1}}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d_{0}}\ =\ \begin{cases} \mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d_{0}-d_{1}}\text{ if }d_{0}\geq d_{1}\\ 0\text{ otherwise}\end{cases}$$ and in particular $$\mathfrak{D}^{d_{1}}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d_{0}}\left(0\right)\ =\ \begin{cases} 1\text{ if }d_{0}=d_{1}\\ 0\text{ otherwise}\end{cases}\text{.}$$
Proof: We proceed by induction (namely on $\text{n}\to\omega$ via the $\text{n}$ pointwise "successor" relations) on $d_{1}$. The base case of $d_{1}=0$ is all but tautological. As for the inductive step, it suffices to verify for $\text{i}\colon\text{n}$ that if $$\mathfrak{D}^{d_{1}}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d_{0}}\ =\ \begin{cases} \mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d_{0}-d_{1}}\text{ if }d_{0}\geq d_{1}\\ 0\text{ otherwise}\end{cases}\text{,}$$ then $$\mathfrak{D}^{d_{1}+1_{\text{i}}}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d_{0}}\ =\ \begin{cases} \mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d_{0}-d_{1}-1_{\text{i}}}\text{ if }d_{0}\geq d_{1}+1_{\text{i}}\\ 0\text{ otherwise}\end{cases}\text{.}$$ Indeed, it suffices to consider the case that $d_{1}\leq d_{0}$, as else is trivial. In this case,
\begin{align*}
\mathfrak{D}^{d_{1}+1_{\text{i}}}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d_{0}}\ &=\ \mathfrak{D}^{1_{\text{i}}}\mathfrak{D}^{d_{1}}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d_{0}}\\
&=\ \left(\text{S}_{\text{i}}-1\right)\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d_{0}-d_{1}}\\
&=\ \left(\text{S}_{\text{i}}-1\right)\prod_{\text{i}'\colon\text{n}} \left(x\mapsto\binom{x}{d_{0}\left(\text{i}'\right)-d_{1}\left(\text{i}'\right)}\right)\\
&=\ \prod_{\substack{\text{i}'\colon\text{n} \\ \text{i}'\neq\text{i}}} \left(x\mapsto\binom{x}{d_{0}\left(\text{i}'\right)-d_{1}\left(\text{i}'\right)}\right)\ \cdot\ \left(\text{S}_{\text{i}}-1\right)\left(x\mapsto\binom{x}{d_{0}\left(\text{i}\right)-d_{1}\left(\text{i}\right)}\right)\\
&=\ \prod_{\substack{\text{i}'\colon\text{n} \\ \text{i}'\neq\text{i}}} \left(x\mapsto\binom{x}{d_{0}\left(\text{i}'\right)-d_{1}\left(\text{i}'\right)}\right)\ \cdot\ \left(x\mapsto\begin{cases} \binom{x}{d_{0}\left(\text{i}\right)-d_{1}\left(\text{i}\right)-1}\text{ if }d_{0}\left(\text{i}\right)-d_{1}\left(\text{i}\right)\geq 1\\ 0\text{ otherwise}\end{cases}\right)\\
&=\ \begin{cases} \mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d_{0}-d_{1}-1_{\text{i}}}\text{ if }d_{0}\geq d_{1}+1_{\text{i}}\\ 0\text{ otherwise}\end{cases}\text{.}
\end{align*}
The second part of the claim is then just by evaluation. $\Box$
Proposition: Given $\Psi\colon\left(\text{n}\to\omega\right)\to\mathbb{K}$, $$\Psi\left(x\right)\ =\ \sum_{d\colon\text{n}\to\omega}\mathfrak{D}^{d}\Psi\left(0\right)\cdot\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x\right)$$ in the above sense.
Proof: This follows by applying the previous proposition to the penultimate proposition. (I.e., we use the former to compute the $\Xi$ from the latter as $\Xi\left(d\right)=\mathfrak{D}^{d}\Psi\left(0\right)$.) $\Box$
Proposition: Given $\Phi\colon\mathbb{K}\left[x_{\text{i}}\right]_{\text{i}\colon\text{n}}$, the set $\mathfrak{d}\left(\Phi\right)$ is contained in the downward closure under $\leq$ of the set of $d\colon\text{n}\to\omega$ of degrees for which the coefficient of $x^{d}$ in $\Phi$ is nonzero (so is in particular finite).
Proof: Remark that (by the elementary properties of binomial coefficients) for $\text{i}$, $d$ as above, $\mathfrak{D}^{1_{\text{i}}}\left(x\mapsto x^{d}\right)$ is $0$ if $d\left(\text{i}\right)=0$ and a $\mathbb{K}$-linear combination of terms $x^{d'}$ otherwise. The claim now follows by induction as before. $\Box$
Proposition: Given $\Phi\colon\mathbb{K}\left[x_{\text{i}}\right]_{\text{i}\colon\text{n}}$ and finite $D\supseteq \mathfrak{d}\left(\Phi\right)$, $$\Phi\left(x\right)\ =\ \sum_{d\colon\ D}\sum_{d'\ \leq\ d}\left(-1\right)^{d-d'}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(d\right)\Phi\left(d'\right)\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x\right)$$ identically in $x\colon\text{n}\to\omega$.
Proof: By the previous and penultimate propositions, as well as a classical extension of the binomial theorem,
\begin{align*}
\Phi\left(x\right)\ &=\ \sum_{d\colon D}\mathfrak{D}^{d}\Phi\left(0\right)\cdot\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x\right)\\
&=\ \sum_{d\colon D}\left(\prod_{\text{i}\colon\text{n}}\left(\text{S}^{d\left(\text{i}\right)\cdot 1_{\text{i}}}-1\right)\Phi\left(0\right)\right)\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x\right)\\
&=\ \sum_{d\colon D}\left(\sum_{d'\leq d}\left(-1\right)^{d-d'}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d'}\left(d\right)\text{S}^{d'}\right)\Phi\left(0\right)\cdot\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x\right)\\
&=\ \sum_{d\colon D}\sum_{d'\leq d}\left(-1\right)^{d-d'}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d'}\left(d\right)\Phi\left(d'\right)\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x\right)
\end{align*}
as claimed. $\Box$
Back to the main question
Lemma: Given $\lambda\colon\text{n}\to\mathbb{K}$ with outputs of norm $<1$, and $d\colon\text{n}\to\omega$, $$\sum_{x\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x\right)\lambda^{x}\ =\ \frac{\lambda^{d}}{\left(1-\lambda\right)^{d+1}}\text{.}$$
Proof: We proceed by induction (namely on $\text{n}\to\omega$ via the $\text{n}$ pointwise "successor" relations). The base case of $x=0$, which is classical, is that $$\sum_{x\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},0}\left(x\right)\lambda^{x}\ =\ \frac{1}{\left(1-\lambda\right)^{1}}\text{.}$$ As for the inductive step for the successor relation pertaining to $\text{i}\colon\text{n}$, we have by hypothesis for a given $x$ that $$\sum_{x\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x\right)\lambda^{x}\ =\ \frac{\lambda^{d}}{\left(1-\lambda\right)^{d+1}}\text{,}$$ from which we deduce that
\begin{align*}
\frac{\lambda^{d+1_{\text{i}}}}{\left(1-\lambda\right)^{d+1_{\text{i}}+1}}\ &=\ \frac{\lambda\left(\text{i}\right)}{1-\lambda\left(\text{i}\right)}\sum_{x\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x\right)\lambda^{x}\\
&=\ \sum_{x'\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x'\right)\lambda^{x'}\frac{\lambda\left(\text{i}\right)}{1-\lambda\left(\text{i}\right)}\\
&=\ \sum_{x'\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x'\right)\lambda^{x'}\left(\sum_{\text{k}\colon\omega}\lambda^{\left(\text{k}+1\right) 1_{\text{i}}}\right)\\
&=\ \sum_{x'\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\sum_{x\succ_{\text{i}}x'}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x'\right)\lambda^{x}\\
&=\ \sum_{x\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\sum_{x'\prec_{\text{i}}x}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(x'\right)\lambda^{x}\\
&=\ \sum_{x\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d+1_{\text{i}}}\left(x\right)\lambda^{x}\text{,}
\end{align*}
as needed. (The absolute convergences and equality of the infinite sums are justified by the absolute convergence and equality of the sums from which they derive in turn, the first by hypothesis.) $\Box$
Result: Given $\Phi\colon\mathbb{K}\left[x_{\text{i}}\right]_{\text{i}\colon\text{n}}$, $\lambda\colon\text{n}\to\mathbb{K}$ with outputs of norm $<1$, and finite $D\supseteq \mathfrak{d}\left(\Phi\right)$, $$\boxed{\sum_{x\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\Phi\left(x\right)\lambda^{x}\ =\ \sum_{d\colon\ D}\sum_{d'\ \leq\ d}\left(-1\right)^{d-d'}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d'}\left(d\right)\Phi\left(d'\right)\frac{\lambda^{d}}{\left(1-\lambda\right)^{d+1}}}\text{.}$$
Proof: By the above, we have that
\begin{align*}
\sum_{d\colon\ \mathfrak{z}\left(\Phi\right)}\sum_{d'\ \leq\ d}\left(-1\right)^{d-d'}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d'}\left(d\right)\Phi\left(d'\right)\frac{\lambda^{d}}{\left(1-\lambda\right)^{d+1}}\ &=\ \sum_{d\colon\ \mathfrak{d}\left(\Phi\right)}\sum_{d'\ \leq\ d}\left(-1\right)^{d-d'}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d'}\left(d\right)\Phi\left(d'\right)\left(\sum_{x\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(\text{x}\right)\lambda^{x}\right)\\
&=\ \sum_{x\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\left(\sum_{d\colon\ \mathfrak{d}\left(\Phi\right)}\sum_{d'\ \leq\ d}\left(-1\right)^{d-d'}\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d'}\left(d\right)\Phi\left(d'\right)\mathfrak{H}_{\text{n},d}\left(\text{x}\right)\right)\lambda^{x}\\
&=\ \sum_{x\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\Phi\left(x\right)\lambda^{x}\text{,}
\end{align*}
as claimed. (The absolute convergences and equality of the infinite sums are as before justified by the absolute convergence and equality of the sums from which they derive in turn.) $\blacksquare$
Sample computation
Suppose, for instance, that we wish to compute $$\sum_{x=0}^{\infty}\sum_{y=0}^{\infty}\frac{x^{3}-3xy+2y^{2}}{\left(-4\right)^{x}5^{y}}\text{.}$$ In the language of the above result, this is the computation $$\sum_{x\colon\ \text{n}\to\omega}\Phi\left(x\right)\lambda^{x}$$ with $$\text{n}\ =\ 2$$ $$\Phi\ \colon\ \left(x_{0},x_{1}\right)\ \mapsto\ x_{0}^{3}-3x_{0}x_{1}+2x_{1}^{2}$$ $$\lambda\ =\ \left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)$$ Now, we have by the usual bound that $$\mathfrak{d}\left(\Phi\right)\ \subseteq\ \left\{\left(0,0\right), \left(0,1\right), \left(0,2\right), \left(1,0\right), \left(1,1\right), \left(2,0\right), \left(3,0\right)\right\}\text{,}$$ so the formula reduces the infinite sum to the $19$-term sum
$$\left(-1\right)^{\left(0,0\right)-\left(0,0\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(0,0\right)}\left(\left(0,0\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(0,0\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(0,0\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(0,0\right)+1}}$$
$$+\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(0,1\right)-\left(0,0\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(0,0\right)}\left(\left(0,1\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(0,0\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(0,1\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(0,1\right)+1}}\ +\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(0,1\right)-\left(0,1\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(0,1\right)}\left(\left(0,1\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(0,1\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(0,1\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(0,1\right)+1}}$$
$$+\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(0,2\right)-\left(0,0\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(0,0\right)}\left(\left(0,2\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(0,0\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(0,2\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(0,2\right)+1}}\ +\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(0,2\right)-\left(0,1\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(0,1\right)}\left(\left(0,2\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(0,1\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(0,2\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(0,2\right)+1}}\ +\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(0,2\right)-\left(0,2\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(0,2\right)}\left(\left(0,2\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(0,2\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(0,2\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(0,2\right)+1}}$$
$$+\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(1,0\right)-\left(0,0\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(0,0\right)}\left(\left(1,0\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(0,0\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(1,0\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(1,0\right)+1}}\ +\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(1,0\right)-\left(1,0\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(1,0\right)}\left(\left(1,0\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(1,0\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(1,0\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(1,0\right)+1}}$$
$$+\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(1,1\right)-\left(0,0\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(0,0\right)}\left(\left(1,1\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(0,0\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(1,1\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(1,1\right)+1}}\ +\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(1,1\right)-\left(0,1\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(0,1\right)}\left(\left(1,1\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(0,1\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(1,1\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(1,1\right)+1}}\ +\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(1,1\right)-\left(1,0\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(1,0\right)}\left(\left(1,1\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(1,0\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(1,1\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(1,1\right)+1}}\ +\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(1,1\right)-\left(1,1\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(1,1\right)}\left(\left(1,1\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(1,1\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(1,1\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(1,1\right)+1}}$$
$$+\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(2,0\right)-\left(0,0\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(0,0\right)}\left(\left(2,0\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(0,0\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(2,0\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(2,0\right)+1}}\ +\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(2,0\right)-\left(1,0\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(1,0\right)}\left(\left(2,0\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(1,0\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(2,0\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(2,0\right)+1}}\ +\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(2,0\right)-\left(2,0\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(2,0\right)}\left(\left(2,0\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(2,0\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(2,0\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(2,0\right)+1}}$$
$$+\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(3,0\right)-\left(0,0\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(0,0\right)}\left(\left(3,0\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(0,0\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(3,0\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(3,0\right)+1}}\ +\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(3,0\right)-\left(1,0\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(1,0\right)}\left(\left(3,0\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(1,0\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(3,0\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(3,0\right)+1}}\ +\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(3,0\right)-\left(2,0\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(2,0\right)}\left(\left(3,0\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(2,0\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(3,0\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(3,0\right)+1}}\ +\ \left(-1\right)^{\left(3,0\right)-\left(3,0\right)}\mathfrak{H}_{2,\left(3,0\right)}\left(\left(3,0\right)\right)\Phi\left(\left(3,0\right)\right)\frac{\left(-\tfrac{1}{4},\ \tfrac{1}{5}\right)^{\left(3,0\right)}}{\left(\tfrac{5}{4},\ \tfrac{4}{5}\right)^{\left(3,0\right)+1}}$$ So that (computing each term)
\begin{align*}
&\sum_{x=0}^{\infty}\sum_{y=0}^{\infty}\frac{x^{3}-3xy+2y^{2}}{\left(-4\right)^{x}5^{y}}\\
&=\ 0+0+\tfrac{1}{2}+0-\tfrac{1}{4}+\tfrac{1}{2}+0-\tfrac{1}{5}+0+\tfrac{1}{10}+\tfrac{1}{20}+0-\tfrac{2}{25}+\tfrac{8}{25}+0-\tfrac{3}{125}+\tfrac{24}{125}-\tfrac{27}{125}\\
&=\ \boxed{\frac{223}{250}}\text{.}
\end{align*}
(Which conforms to the value I got when I approximated it...)