3
$\begingroup$

I mean, is it possible to have a connection on the 2-sphere with vanishing curvature but not vanishing torsion? In a more general sense, it is know that every Riemannian manifold has a Levi-Civita connection,is this true for the Weitzenböck connection?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I suggest you to ask this question on MathOverflow.net $\endgroup$ – Yuri Vyatkin Feb 22 '13 at 5:57
2
$\begingroup$

It seems to me that a vector bundle on a simply connected manifold that has a flat connection must be trivial. (Parallel transport a frame at a base point to all other points.) But $S^2$ is far from parallelizable.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. Your comment makes things clear. Is it correct then to say that there are topological obstructions for the existence of Weitzenböck connection? If I understand correctly, if one assume $S^{2}$ has a flat connection then one can choose a frame and parallel transport it all over the sphere. The condition of being flat implies the parallel transport is path independent. Moreover,by glueing geodesics one can form a non vanishing vector field on $S^{2}$. The result given by the problem of combing the sphere give us a contradiction. $\endgroup$ – yess Mar 25 '14 at 1:27
  • $\begingroup$ Well, parallel transport is path-independent because of both flatness and simple-connectivity. I would not mention the word geodesic — it's normally associated to an affine connection. Right, $\chi(S^2)=2$ tells us the tangent bundle is not trivial. $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Mar 25 '14 at 1:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.