0
$\begingroup$

I am struggling to understand the motivation for the definition of the Gram Matrix and its corresponding role for the definition of the Lebesgue measure on submanifolds.

$M \subset \mathbb{R}^n\ k$ dimensional $C^1$-Submanifold

$\phi^{-1}: T \subseteq \mathbb{R}^m \to M$ local parametrization of M

We define the Gram-Matrix as

$G_\phi: T \to \mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$

$t \mapsto (D(\phi^{-1}(t))^TD(\phi^{-1}(t)) $

and its corresponding determinant at $t\in T: g_\phi(t)$.

Using this one defines the m-dimensional-Lebesgue measure $\lambda^m$ on the Submanifold M (for simplification assume that there exists a map which already describes all of $M$, i.e.:

$ \phi: M \mapsto T \subset \mathbb{R}^m $, the Atlas of M is only one map.)

Then one defines:

$\lambda_M: \mathbb{B}^d \cap M \to [0,\infty]$

$ B \mapsto \int_{\phi(B)} (g_{ \phi^{-1}}(t))^{1/2}d\lambda^m(t) $

I think the usage of the Gram-Determinant accounts for some deformation of $\phi$, similar to the Transformation Rule, but the construction of the Gram-Matrix does not make sense to me yet.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.