Let $X$ and $Y$ be Banach spaces.

(a) Let $T \in \mathcal{L}(X, Y )$. For each sequence $(x_n)_{n \geq 1}$ in $X$ and each $x \in X$, show that $x_n →x$ weakly, as $n \rightarrow \infty$ ,implies that $Tx_n \rightarrow Tx$ weakly, as $n\rightarrow \infty$.

(b) Let $T \in \mathcal{K}(X, Y )$. For each sequence $(x_n)_{n \geq 1}$ in $X$ and each $x \in X$, show that $x_n →x$ weakly, as $n \rightarrow \infty$ ,implies that $||Tx_n -Tx|| \rightarrow 0$ , as $n\rightarrow \infty$..

(c) Conversely, if $X$ is reflexive and separable, and $T \in \mathcal{L}(X,Y)$ satisfies that $∥Tx_n − Tx∥ \rightarrow 0$, as $n \rightarrow \infty$, whenever $(x_n)_{n\geq 1}$ is a sequence in $X$ converging weakly to $x \in X$, then $T \in \mathcal{K}(X, Y )$.

(d) Show that each $T \in \mathcal{L}(X,l_1(\mathbb{N}))$ is compact, whenever $X$ is reflexive and separable.

(e) Let $Y$ be infinite dimensional. Show that no $T \in \mathcal{K}(X, Y )$ is open.

(f) Show that there is no reflexive separable Banach space $X$ such that $l_1(\mathbb{N}) = T(X)$, for some $T \in \mathcal{L}(X,l_1(\mathbb{N}))$.

My attempt:

(a) We have that $x_n \rightarrow x$ weakly if and only if $f(x_n) \rightarrow f(x)$ weakly for every $ f \in X^*$. Now $Tx_n \rightarrow Tx$ weakly if and only if $g(Tx_n) \rightarrow g(Tx)$ weakly for every $g \in Y^*$. But for every $g \in Y^*$ we have $gT \in X^*$. Therefore $Tx_n \rightarrow Tx \Leftrightarrow g(Tx_n) \rightarrow g(Tx) \Leftrightarrow (gT)x_n \rightarrow (gT)x \Leftrightarrow x_n \rightarrow x$ weakly.

b) Since $T$ is compact I know that every sequence is sent to a sequence that has a convergent subsequence, but then I don't know how to proceed.

c) I have a hint for this problem:

Suppose that $T$ is not compact. Show that there exists $\delta > 0$ and a sequence $(x_n)_{n\geq 1}$ in the unit ball of $X$ such that $∥Tx_n −Tx_m∥ \geq \delta$, for all $n \neq m$.. Show next that $(x_n)_{n\geq 1}$ has a weakly convergent subsequence.

(d) Now let $(x_n)_{n \geq 1}$ be a sequence in $ X$ and $x \in X$ such that $ x_n \rightarrow x$ weakly, as $n \rightarrow \infty$. By part (a) since $T \in \mathcal{L}(X,l_1(\mathbb{N}))$ we get $Tx_n \rightarrow Tx$ weakly, as $n \rightarrow \infty$. But weak convergence is the same as norm convergence in $l_1(\mathbb{N})$. Therefore $||Tx_n-Tx|| \rightarrow 0$, as $n \rightarrow \infty$. So we can use part $c)$ to deduce that $T \in \mathcal{K}(X,l_1(\mathbb{N}))$, as requested.

(e) I know that if $Y$ is infinite dimensional the unit ball in $Y$ is not compact.

(f) Since $X$ is reflexive and separable, by part (d) we get that $T$ is compact. Suppose now that $l_1(\mathbb{N})=T(X)$, i.e. $T$ is surjective. By the Open Mapping Theorem $T$ is open and this contradicts part (e).


(a) Looks good!

(b) Using this fact and (a), you should be set. If $Tx_n$ fails to converge to $Tx$ in norm, then there must be a subsequence $(Tx_{n_k})_k$ that maintains at least some $\varepsilon > 0$ distance from $Tx$. Take a norm-convergent subsequence of this subsequence, and it will be a subsequence that fails to weakly converge to $Tx$ (as it norm-converges to another point). This contradicts (a).

(c) Not sure where separability comes in here, but if $T$ is not compact, then $T(B_X)$ is not totally bounded. That is, there exists a $\delta > 0$ such that no finite number of balls radius $\delta$ that cover $T(B_X)$. Hence, we may choose some $Tx_1 \in T(B_X)$, and for each $n$, $$Tx_{n+1} \in T(B_X) \setminus \bigcup_{k=1}^n B[x_k; \delta],$$ which is never empty by definition of $\delta$. Thus, we have a sequence $(x_n) \in B_X$ such that $$\|Tx_n - Tx_m\| > \delta$$ for all $n, m$. Using reflexivity, as well as Eberlein-Smulian, the sequence $(x_n)$ must have a weakly convergent subsequence. Note that this weakly convergent subsequence must also have its terms separated by at least $\delta$, which means it cannot be mapped to a norm-convergent sequence (as such a sequence would have to be Cauchy). This shows the contrapositive of (c).

(d) Good.

(e) If $T$ is compact and open, then $T(B[0; 1])$ contains $T(B(0; 1))$, which is open, since $T$ is an open map. Thus, $T(B[0; 1])$ contains some ball $B[y; r]$. Since $T$ is compact, the closure of $T(B[0; 1])$ is compact, hence so is the closed subset $B[y; r]$. A scaling and translation argument yields that $Y$ has a compact unit ball, and hence is finite-dimensional.

(f) Also good.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.