0
$\begingroup$

After asking a question regarding the math myself, as well as finding some others, I am still puzzled by the opening sections of Jordan, D. and Smith, P. (2011). Nonlinear ordinary differential equations. We start off with the equation of motion for a simple pendulum, where $x$ denotes the angular displacement of the pendulum: $$ \ddot{x} + \omega^2 \sin{x} = 0. $$ Here, $\ddot{x} = \mathop{\mathrm{d}}^2x/\mathop{\mathrm{d}}t^2$, and similarily, $\dot{x}= \mathop{\mathrm{d}}x / \mathop{\mathrm{d}}{t}$. Then, the first element that confuses me is the statement $$ \ddot{x} = \frac{\mathop{\mathrm{d}}}{\mathop{\mathrm{d}}t} \frac{\mathop{\mathrm{d}}x}{\mathop{\mathrm{d}}t} = \frac{\mathop{\mathrm{d}}\dot{x}}{\mathop{\mathrm{d}}t} = \frac{\mathop{\mathrm{d}}\dot{x}}{\mathop{\mathrm{d}}x} \frac{\mathop{\mathrm{d}x}}{\mathop{\mathrm{d}}t} = \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}x} \left(\frac{1}{2} \dot{x}^2 \right). $$ According to the authors, this is known as the energy transformation. I haven't been able to find any other literature supporting this, so my first question is this: Is energy transformation a general term for ODEs, or is it a special name for this operation on the pendulum equation?

To continue, I understand the equation given that one may write $\dot{x} = \dot{x}(x)$, but that doesn't seem right to me, as the angular velocity may be both increasing and decreasing at any given $x$, depending upon if the pendulum is currently moving "up" or "down". I wouldn't know how to evaluate $\mathop{\mathrm{d}}\dot{x} / \mathop{\mathrm{d}}x$ by itself. My second question is therefore: Is there a more rigorous way to arrive at the same result?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Simply multiply the equation with $\dot x$ and integrate for the time to get $$ \int (\dot x\ddot x+ω^2\sin(x)\dot x)dt=\frac12\dot x^2 + ω^2(1-\cos x) = E(x,\dot x)=const. $$ The second part can be substituted as $\int \sin x\,dx$. Forcing the same substitution on the first term instead of integrating directly as product $\int v\dot v\,dt$ gives rise to the cited contortion of the formalism.

Note that in the Lagrange formalism you get in this context $$ \ddot x =\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial(\frac12\dot x^2)}{\partial \dot x}. $$ as part of the Euler-Lagrange equations $$ 0=\frac{d}{dt}\frac{∂L}{∂\dot x}-\frac{∂L}{∂x}. $$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, this made me understand it. Is your integral correct, by the way? Shouldn't it be $\int \left( \dot{x} \ddot{x} + \omega^2 \sin{(x)} \dot{x} \right) dt = \frac{1}{2} \dot{x}^2 - \omega^2 \cos{x}$? $\endgroup$ – Erik André Jan 11 at 19:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There is a free integration constant. I choose to have the energy at rest to be zero, $E=\frac12\dot x^2+\frac{ω^2}2(2\sin\frac x2)^2.$ Your choice gives a minimality of terms. $\endgroup$ – LutzL Jan 11 at 20:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.