3
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a topological space which is not locally-compact (e.g., an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space). Let $C_{0}(X)$ denote the space of complex-valued, continuous functions vanishing at infinity on $X$, that is, an element $f\in C_{0}(X)$ is a complex-valued, continuous function on $X$ such that,for every $\epsilon>0$, there exists a compact $K\subset X$ such that $|f(x)|\leq \epsilon$ outside $K$. It is my understanding that $C_{0}(X)$ is a Banach space just as $C_{0}(Y)$ with $Y$ a locally-compact space.

However, in the second page of this article, it is stated that $C_{0}(X)$ only contains the zero function when $X$ is not locally-compact, but the statement is not proved. On the other hand, at the end of the first page of this article, it is said that $C_{0}(X)$ may be very small (which, I guess, means that there are non-vanishing elements in it), but the statement is also not proved. Furthermore, in the accepted answer of this question, it is given an example of a non-vanishing functions vanishing at infinity on a non-locally compact space, but nothing is said about its continuity.

Since I have not a strong background in functional analysis, I really do not know where to start to prove/disprove the previous statements, thus I would appreciate any hint, or any suggestion about references dealing with these matters explicitely (that is, by giving explicit proofs).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Consider the function $f\colon \ell^2\to \mathbb R$ given by $$f(x_1, x_2, x_3, \ldots)=e^{-x_1^2}.$$ Isn't this function in $C_0(\ell^2)$? $\endgroup$ – Giuseppe Negro Jan 10 at 11:00
  • $\begingroup$ I was thinking to a similar example, however, if we fix $\epsilon$, then $|f(x)|\geq\epsilon$ whenever $x=(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},...)$ is such that $x_{1}^{2}\leq \ln(\epsilon)$ and $x_{j}$ is arbitrary for $j>1$, and I do not know if this is a compact set. $\endgroup$ – SepulzioNori Jan 10 at 11:30
  • $\begingroup$ Of course that set is not compact. You are totally right. Sorry, my example is stupid; even the function $$f(x_1, x_2)=e^{-x_1^2}$$ is not in $C_0(\mathbb R^2)$. The right example would be $$f(x_1, x_2, \ldots) = e^{-x_1^2 -x_2^2 -\ldots}.$$ And now it is not so obvious that this is in $C_0(\ell^2)$. Actually, I am quite sure it is not. $\endgroup$ – Giuseppe Negro Jan 10 at 11:49
2
$\begingroup$

The space $C_0(X)$ can certainly be non-trivial even if $X$ is not locally compact. Just take a locally compact space $Y$, a space $Z$ that is not locally compact and let $X$ be the disjoint union of $Y$ and $Z$. Every $f\in C_0(Y)$ induces a a function $F\in C_0(X)$ by setting $F|_Y=f$, $F|_Z=0$.

That $C_0(X)$ may be small if $X$ is not locally compact is not so much a rigorous statement, but gives a good intuition. If $X$ lacks compact sets, then the condition $f\in C_0(X)$ is quite rigid. In the example above there are still enough compact subsets to produce some functions in $C_0(X)$.

In the special case of infinite-dimensional normed spaces, $C_0$ is indeed trivial. To see this, let $f\in C_0(X)$ and $\epsilon>0$. By definition there exists $K\subset X$ compact such that $|f|\leq \epsilon$ on $X\setminus K$. By Riesz's lemma, $K$ has empty interior. Thus $|f|\leq \epsilon$ everywhere. Since $\epsilon>0$ was arbitrary, we conclude $f=0$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ A very nice and exhaustive answer, thank you very much. $\endgroup$ – SepulzioNori Jan 10 at 15:53
  • $\begingroup$ I agree, great answer, thank you. $\endgroup$ – Giuseppe Negro Jan 10 at 17:20

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.