why the boundary of a contractible, simply connected 2 dimensional simplicial manifold is connected? Why the boundary of a contractible,  simply connected 2 dimensional  simplicial manifold is connected? The conclusion is false for simplicial complexes if you consider the two cones $CS^1$ with their top points identified. That is a contractible simply connected simplicial complex with two $S^1$ as its boundary, but it is not a simplicial manifold. The neighborhood around the identified point is not homeomorphic to $R^n$. 
 A: If the boundary wasn't connected, you could draw a path from one component to the other.  You could make this path a properly-embedded arc in the manifold.  By design, removal of this arc from the manifold would not disconnect it (because there's a path from one side of the arc to the other, say in one of the boundary circles).  
The Thom class of the normal bundle of this arc is then a non-trivial element of $H^1$ of the manifold $M$, so the manifold can't be disconnected.  Said another way, given a loop in your manifold, you could take the mod-2 intersection number with this arc.  That's a non-zero functional $Hom(H_1 M, \mathbb Z_2)$. 
Edit: here is another construction.  A little tubular neighbourhood of the arc $A$ I describe above is homeomorphic to $A \times [-1,1]$, where $(\partial A) \times [-1,1]$ correspond to the points in $\partial M$. Take the composite $A \times [-1,1] \to [-1,1] \to S^1$ where the first map is projection onto the $[-1,1]$ factor and the second map is $[-1,1] \to S^1$ given by $x \longmapsto e^{\pi i x}$.  Extend this map $A \times [-1,1] \to S^1$ to a continuous function $M \to S^1$ by sending all the points outside of $A \times [-1,1]$ to $1 \in S^1$.    
The fact that our arc does not separate $M$ tells us that this map $M \to S^1$ is non-trivial on the fundamental group. 
