1
$\begingroup$

Suppose $E$ is measurable with $m(E) \lt \infty$ , and $$E=E_1 \cup E_2 , E_1 \cap E_2 \text{is empty}$$ Show that if $m(E)=m_*(E_1)+m_*(E_2)$ , then $E_1$ and $E_2$ are measurable.

My attempt:
Since $E_2=E-E_1$ , it suffice to prove $E_1$ is measurable . And for $E_1$ , since $m_*(E_1)\le m(E) \lt \infty$ , for any $\epsilon$ , we can find an open set $O$ such taht $E_1 \subset O$ and $m(O)-m_*(E_1) \lt \epsilon$ , but how to show that $m_*(O-E_1)\lt \epsilon$ ?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Let $\epsilon>0$ be arbitrarily given and $U_i$, $i=1,2$ be open sets such that $E_i\subset U_i$ and $$ m_*E_i\le mU_i<m_*E_i +\epsilon $$ for $i=1,2$. Since $ E\subset U_1\cup U_2, $ we have $$ mE \leq m(U_1\cup U_2)=mU_1+mU_2-m(U_1\cap U_2). $$ This gives $m(U_1\cap U_2)\le mU_1+mU_2-mE<2\epsilon$ by the assumption that $mE=m_*E_1+m_* E_2$. Now, observe that $$ U_i\setminus E_i \subset \left(U_1\cap U_2\right)\cup \left(\left(U_1\cup U_2\right)\setminus E\right). $$ This implies $$\begin{eqnarray} m_*(U_i\setminus E_i)&\le& m_*\left( \left(U_1\cap U_2\right)\cup \left(\left(U_1\cup U_2\right)\setminus E\right)\right)\\ &\le& m(U_1\cap U_2)+m(\left(U_1\cup U_2\right)\setminus E)\\ &\le& 2\epsilon +m(U_1\cup U_2)-mE\\ &\le& 2\epsilon + mU_1+mU_2-mE<4\epsilon. \end{eqnarray}$$ Since $\epsilon>0$ was arbitrary, it says that $E_i$ are measurable for $i=1,2$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.