2
$\begingroup$

I have a very fundamental question on how to prove something like $\sqrt{3} \not\in \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$. In all of the proofs trying to show something similar eg. here, or here it is shown that (for the particular example above) the equation

$$\sqrt{3} = a + b \sqrt{2}$$

for some $a,b \in \mathbb{Q}$ leads to a contradiction. How does this prove the proposition?

My closest guess is that the approach comes from the fact that $\sqrt{2}$ is algebraic over $K$ and thus $\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}]/(x^2-2) \simeq \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$. But then we needed to show that

$$\sqrt{3} = a + b (x^2 - 2)$$

with $a,b \in \mathbb{Q}[x]$ leads to a contradiction, which is MUCH more freedom.

What am I missing?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @DietrichBurde Does that then not contradict the isomorphism $\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}]/(x^2-2) \simeq \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$? $\endgroup$ – G. Chiusole Jan 7 at 19:55
  • $\begingroup$ The constant $0$ function, isn't it? $\endgroup$ – G. Chiusole Jan 7 at 19:59
  • $\begingroup$ Well isn't $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$ defined to be the fraction field over $\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}]$? Given the other answers I feel like I have faulty definitions $\endgroup$ – G. Chiusole Jan 7 at 20:02
  • $\begingroup$ It clearly means $\Bbb Q[x]/(x^2-2)\cong \Bbb Q(\sqrt{2})$ and not what you have written. So, yes, there is some "faulty" concept - never mind. Now you have at least a clear answer to your question in the last line. $\endgroup$ – Dietrich Burde Jan 7 at 20:04
  • $\begingroup$ Are you saying that the function is an isomorphism or not? Also, given the iso, how does $x^2 - 2$ being a polynomial in $\mathbb{Q}[x]$ contradict it being the constant $0$ function in $\mathbb{Q}/(x^2 - 2)$ and thus in $\mathbb{Q}(x)$? $\endgroup$ – G. Chiusole Jan 7 at 20:21
0
$\begingroup$

To begin, how does assuming

$\sqrt 3 = a + b\sqrt 2, \; a, b \in \Bbb Q, \tag 1$

help prove that

$\sqrt 3 \notin \Bbb Q(\sqrt 2)? \tag 2$

It may help to understand that

$\Bbb Q(\sqrt 2) = \{ a + b\sqrt 2; \; a, b \in \Bbb Q \}; \tag 3$

that is, $\Bbb Q(\sqrt 2)$, the smallest field contaning $\Bbb Q$ and $\sqrt 2$, is precisely the set on the right of (3); we can in fact easily demonstrate a more general fact, that is

$\Bbb Q(\sqrt p) = \{ a + b\sqrt p, \; a, b \in \Bbb Q \}, \tag 4$

where again $\Bbb Q(\sqrt p)$ is the smallest field containing $\Bbb Q$ and $\sqrt p$; here I assume, for the time being at least, that $p \in P$ is prime. We note that the set on the right is clearly closed under addition, and also under multiplication, since

$(a + b\sqrt p)(c + d\sqrt p) = (ac + bdp) + (ad + bc)\sqrt p; \tag 5$

as for multiplicative inverses, we observe that

$a^2 - b^2p \ne 0, \forall a, b \in \Bbb Q, \tag 6$

lest

$\sqrt p = \dfrac{\vert a \vert}{\vert b \vert } \in \Bbb Q. \tag 7$

(Here we assume the fact that no prime has a rational square root, the proof of which is easy, mimicing as it does the classic Euclidean proof that $\sqrt 2$ is irrational.) By virtue of (6) we may write

$(a + b\sqrt p)\left (\dfrac{a - b\sqrt p}{a^2 - b^2 p} \right ) = \dfrac{a^2 - b^2 p}{a^2 - b^2p} = 1, \tag 8$

whence

$(a + b\sqrt p)^{-1} = \dfrac{a - b\sqrt p }{a^2 - b^2 p}; \tag 9$

in the light of (5), (8) and (9) we see that $\{ a + b \sqrt p; \; a, b \in \Bbb Q \}$ is closed under multiplication and reciprocation, and is hence a field; evidently

$\{ a + b \sqrt p; \; a, b \in \Bbb Q \} \subset \Bbb Q(\sqrt p), \tag{10}$

while certainly

$\Bbb Q(\sqrt p) \subset \{ a + b \sqrt p; \; a, b \in \Bbb Q \}, \tag{11}$

since $\Bbb Q(\sqrt p)$ is the smallest field containing $\Bbb Q$ and $\sqrt p$; thus (4) binds.

Now let

$q \in \Bbb P, \; q \ne p; \tag{12}$

then if

$\sqrt q \in \Bbb Q(\sqrt p), \tag{13}$

we have via (4) that

$\sqrt q = a + b \sqrt p, \; a, b \in \Bbb Q; \tag{14}$

now we cannot have $b = 0$ lest

$\sqrt q = a \in \Bbb Q, \tag{15}$

and if $a = 0$,

$q = b^2 p; \tag{16}$

then we may write

$b = \dfrac{r}{s}; \; r, s \in \Bbb Z, \; \gcd(r, s) = 1; \tag{17}$

$r^2p = s^2q, \tag{18}$

whence

$q \mid r^2p \Longrightarrow q \mid r^2, \tag{19}$

since $p \ne q$ are primes; then

$q \mid r^2 \Longrightarrow q \mid r \Longrightarrow r = cq, \; c \in Z; \tag{20}$

$r = cq \Longrightarrow c^2q^2 p = s^2q \Longrightarrow q \mid s^2 \Longrightarrow q \mid s; \tag{21}$

but (20) and (21) together contradict $\gcd(r, s) = 1$; thus $a \ne 0$ and hence

$ab \ne 0; \tag{22}$

now it follows from (14) that

$q = a^2 + pb^2 + 2ab \sqrt p, \tag{23}$

which in the light of (22) implies

$\sqrt p = \dfrac{q - a^2 - pb^2}{2ab} \in \Bbb Q, \tag{24}$

which is impossible for a prime such as $p$; we conclude that

$\sqrt q \notin \Bbb Q(\sqrt p). \tag{25}$

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

If $\alpha\in\mathbb C$, then $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$ is the smallest subfield of $\mathbb C$ containing $\alpha$. But$$\left\{a+b\sqrt2\,\middle|\,a,b\in\mathbb Q\right\}$$is a field which contains $\sqrt2$ and it is clearly the smallest such subfield. Therefore,$$\mathbb{Q}\left(\sqrt2\right)=\left\{a+b\sqrt2\,\middle|\,a,b\in\mathbb Q\right\}.$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.