Use the following example to show that the hypothesis in the Radon-Nikodym Theorem that $\mu$ is $\sigma$-finite cannot be omitted. Let $X=[0,1],\ \mathcal{B}$ the class of Lebesgue measurable subsets of $[0, 1]$, and take $\nu$, to be Lebesgue measure and $\mu$ to be the counting measure on $\mathcal{B}$. Then $\nu$ is finite and absolutely continuous with respect to $\mu$, but there is no function $f$ such that $\nu E = \int_{E} f d\mu$ for all $E\in\mathcal{B}.$ Solution. Suppose there is a function $f$ such that $\nu(E) = \int_{E} f d\mu$ for all $E\in\mathcal{B}$. Since $\nu$ es finite, $f$ is integrable with respect to $\mu$. Thus $E_0 = \left\{x : f(x)\neq 0\right\}$ is countable. Now $0=\nu(E_0)=\int_{E_0}fd\mu$. Contradiction. Hence there is no such function I have a doubts:

Why $E_0$ is countable?

Why $\int_{E_0}fd\mu=0$ is a contradiction?


Why is $E_0$ countable?

Observe that $ E_0 = \bigcup_{n \in \mathbb N} F_n,$ where $ F_n : = \{ x : | f(x) | > \tfrac 1 n \}. $ Also observe that $$\int_{[0,1]} |f| \ d\mu \geq \int_{F_n} |f| \ d\mu\geq \frac{1}{n}\mu(F_n)=\frac{|F_n|}{n}.$$

For $f$ to be $\mu$-integrable, we therefore require that $|F_n|$ is finite for each $n$, and this implies that $E_0$ is countable.

Why is $\int_{E_0} f d\mu = 0$ a contradiction?

It is worth pointing out that $f$ must be non-negative everywhere. (Because if $f$ is negative for some $x \in [0,1]$, then we would have $\nu(\{ x\}) = f(x) \mu(\{ x\}) = f(x) < 0$.)

Since $f$ is non-negative and non-zero on $E_0$, $f$ must in fact be strictly positive on $E_0$. If $E_0$ is non-empty (say $x \in E_0$), then $$\nu(E_0) = \int_{E_0} f \ d\mu \geq f(x) \mu(\{ x \})= f(x)> 0,$$ which is false, since the Lebesgue measure of any countable set is zero.

So $E_0$ must be empty. But then $f$ would be zero everywhere, which would imply that the Lebesgue measure is the zero measure, and this is absurd too.

Is there a more direct way of proving this?

Personally, I would argue as follows. $\nu (E) = \int_E f \ d\mu$ holds for all Lebesgue-measurable $E$, so in particular, it must hold when $E$ is a singleton set $ \{ x \}$. Thus we have $$ 0 = \nu (\{ x \})=\int_{\{ x\}} f \ d\mu=f(x) \mu(\{ x \})=f(x)$$ for all $x \in [0,1]$, i.e. $f$ is identically zero.

But then, considering the case $E = [0,1]$, we have $$ 1 = \nu([0,1]) = \int_{[0,1]}f \ d\mu = \int_{[0,1]}0 \ d\mu = 0,$$

which is a contradiction.


For a sum of the elements of a set to be finite, the number of non-zero elements must be at most countable. This is the reason for $E_0$ being countable.

The contradiction occurs because $f>0$ on $E_0,$ and $E_0$ is non-empty since $\nu>0,$ so $\int_{E_0} f \, d\mu > 0.$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.