The definitions of the two are so alike, that it confuses me.

Cauchy's General Principle:

The necessary and sufficient condition that a function $f(x)$ may tend to a definite limit, say $l$, as $x \to a$, is that:

If $\forall \epsilon>0$, $\exists$ a $ \ \delta>0$ such that $|f(x_1)-f(x_2)| < \epsilon$ whenever $0<|x_1-a|<\delta, \ 0<|x_2-a|<\delta $

Uniform Continuity:

A function $f$ defined on a domain $D$ is said to be uniformly continuous on the set $S$ $( S \subset D)$ if:

$\forall \ \epsilon >0$, $\exists $ a $\delta>0$, such that $|f(x_1)-f(x_2)|< \epsilon$ for any two points $x_1, x_2 \in S$ with $|x_1-x_2| < \delta$.

First of all, I understand that the former definition is a "Local Concept" i.e. it focuses around the particular point $a$ , while the other one is a "Global Concept", i.e. defined all over the set $S$. Another thing is, the sign "$0<$ " in the General Principle. It deletes the point "$a$" from the neighbourhood of both $x_1$ and $x_2$, while the other does not. But the similarity is, both definitions give independence to choose arbitrary pair of points within a certain neighbourhood.

Is anything wrong with my perception? Am I missing anything very obvious?

Please do provide further insight.

| cite | improve this question | | | | |

I get it that way:
simple convergence : given a $\in$ I, $\forall \epsilon>0, \exists \delta$ such as $|x-a|<\delta \implies |f(x)-f(a)|<\epsilon$
therefore this location is local, we defined a before epsilon so every epsilon is a function of a, and every delta a function of epsilon.
In your definition of uniform continuity, x1 and x2 are introduced after epsilon and delta, (not x dependents) which guarantees the fonction converges at every x at the same "speed".

| cite | improve this answer | | | | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.