2
$\begingroup$

I find a tricky proof shows "almost uniformly convergent" implies "uniformly convergent almost everywhere". I know it is wrong, for there is a counterexample. Can anyone help me why this proof is wrong?

I got the inspiration from the proof that shows "almost uniformly convergent" implies "convergent almost everywhere":

It says $\forall \epsilon, \exists B_\epsilon, \mu(B_\epsilon)<\epsilon$ outside of which $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ and prove $B\equiv\bigcap_{n\in\mathbb{N}}B_{\frac{1}{n}}$ is zero-measure. I think in this case, outside $B$, $f_n \to f$ no only converges pointwise (as the proof says) but also converges uniformly (for it is true outside any $B_\frac{1}{n}$). Since $\mu(B)=0$, it implies $f_n \to f$ converges uniformly almost everywhere.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Consider a simple example:

$x^n \to 0$ almost uniformly on $[0,1]$. Indeed, for every $\varepsilon > 0$ we have $x^n \to 0$ uniformly on $B_\varepsilon^c = [0,1-\varepsilon]$ where $B_\varepsilon = [1-\varepsilon, 1]$ has measure $\varepsilon$.

However on $$B^c = \left(\bigcap_{n=1}^\infty B_{\frac1n}\right)^c = \left(\bigcap_{n=1}^\infty \left[1-\frac1n,1\right]\right)^c = \{1\}^c = [0,1\rangle$$ the convergence $x^n \to 0$ is not uniform. It is only uniform on segments $B_{\frac1n}^c=\left[0,1-\frac1n\right]$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the clear example. It helps. As Umberto says in another answer, that is the wrong place. But I am a little confused about why combining all $B_{\frac{1}{n}}$ is right for pointwise convergence but not for uniformly convergence. Can you tell me their difference? $\endgroup$ – Xuchuang Dec 28 '18 at 14:41
  • $\begingroup$ @Xuchuang On $B_{\frac1n}^c$ we have $f_n \to f$ uniformly, and in particular pointwise. Then for every $x \in B^c$, we have $x \in B_{\frac1n}^c$ for some $n \in \mathbb{N}$ so $f_n(x) \to f(x)$. Since $x$ was arbitrary, we conclude $f_n \to f$ pointwise on $B^c$. We cannot conclude $f_n \to f$ uniformly as the example shows. $\endgroup$ – mechanodroid Dec 28 '18 at 15:12
  • $\begingroup$ It's sort of like how the function $x \mapsto \frac1x$ is uniformly continuous on all segments $[a,b] \subseteq \langle 0, \infty\rangle$ but it is not uniformly continuous on entire $\langle 0,\infty\rangle$. $\endgroup$ – mechanodroid Dec 28 '18 at 15:14
  • $\begingroup$ It makes sense. $x$ and $\epsilon$ are both arbitrary in uniformly convergence. Thank you very much. $\endgroup$ – Xuchuang Dec 29 '18 at 3:02
0
$\begingroup$

You have that $\{f_n\}$ converges uniformly on each set $B_{\frac 1n}^c$. There is no reason why it should converge uniformly on $\displaystyle \bigcup_n B_{\frac 1n}^c$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, I also think that may be the wrong place. But the original proof also don't show why it should converge pointwise on $\bigcup_n B_{\frac{1}{n}}^c$. Is there a difference between them. $\endgroup$ – Xuchuang Dec 28 '18 at 14:16
  • $\begingroup$ That isn't to hard to see. If a point $x$ belongs to $\bigcup_n B^c_{\frac 1n}$, then there exists (at least one) index $n$ with $x \in B_{\frac 1n}^c$. This means that $f_n(x) \to f(x)$. $\endgroup$ – Umberto P. Dec 28 '18 at 14:18
  • $\begingroup$ But the converges pointwise is derived from converges uniformly in the proof. If there exists a single index $n$ for pointwise, it must already have an index $n$ for uniformly to support the derivation. Am I right? $\endgroup$ – Xuchuang Dec 28 '18 at 14:27
  • $\begingroup$ You are right. The wrong place is when unionizing those $B_{\frac{1}{n}}^c$, it may change interval's bound (like close to open). Pointwise convergence is OK with that but uniformly convergence is not. Thank you! $\endgroup$ – Xuchuang Dec 29 '18 at 3:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.