3
$\begingroup$

If $ S_t $ follows a log-normal Brownian motion, what SDE does the square of $ S_t $ follow?

I have found two possibles ways of solving it. But, they diverge with respect to the drift.

  1. First solution: We recall the stochastic equation: $ dS_t = \mu S_t dt + \sigma S_t \, dW_t $ and its solutions $ S_t = S_0 \exp((\mu-\sigma^2/2)t + \sigma W_t) $. Applying directly to $ S_t^2 $, we got: $ S_t^2 = S_0^2 \exp((2\mu-\sigma^2)t + 2\sigma W_t) $. The drift component is $ (2\mu-\sigma^2) $.
  2. Second solution: We say that $ f(S_t)=S_t^2 $. Applying Itô's formula, we get: $ dS_t^2 = 2S_td \, S_t + \sigma^2 S_t^2 \, dt \rightarrow dS_t^2 = (2\mu + \sigma^2)S_t^2 \, dt + 2\sigma S_t^2 \, dW_t $. The drift component is $ (2\mu + \sigma^2) $

Which is the correct solution? Where am I making a mistake?

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

There is no contradiction between your two approaches. If we define

$$X_t := S_0^2 \exp \left( (2 \mu - \sigma^2)t +2 \sigma W_t \right)$$

(which is the process which you got in your first solution) then a straight-forward application of Itô's formula shows that

$$dX_t = 2 \sigma X_t \, d W_t + \left( 2\mu + \sigma^2 \right) X_t \, dt,$$

and this is exactly the SDE which you got in your second approach.

To get from the second solution to the first one you may note that

$$d(S_t^2) = (2\mu+\sigma^2) S_t^2 \, dt + 2 \sigma S_t^2 \, dW_t$$

shows that $X_t := S_t^2$ solves the SDE

$$dX_t = (2\mu+\sigma^2) X_t \, dt + 2 \sigma X_t \, dW_t,$$

and as you pointed out in your first approach the solution to this SDE is given by

$$X_t = X_0 \exp \left((2\mu+\sigma^2-(2\sigma)^2/2)t + (2\sigma) W_t \right)$$

which is exactly the process which you got in your first solution.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Really thank you, @saz! I was not seeing that one was the derivative of the other... But okay, it helped in my learning process, thanks! Obs: In your last equation, to be 100% precise, it should be $ X_t = X_0 exp((2\mu+\sigma^2 - (2\sigma)^2/2)t + (2t)W_t) $ and it will be perfect. $\endgroup$
    – fvsa
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:00
  • $\begingroup$ @FabricioAlmeida Thanks for pointing out the typo; I fixed it. $\endgroup$
    – saz
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:13
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your help! $\endgroup$
    – fvsa
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.