0
$\begingroup$

Let $n \geq 3$ be a fixed integer and consider an arbitrary set of the events $\{A_i, 1 \leq i \leq n \}$ in the same probability space. Consider the following two sums of probabilities: \begin{align} S_1 ^{(n)} &= \sum_{1 \leq i \leq n} \mathbb{P}(A_i); \\ S_2 ^{(n)} &= \sum_{1 \leq i_1 < i_2 \leq n} \mathbb{P}(A_{i_1} \cap A_{i_2}). \end{align} The question is whether it holds that $S_1 ^{(n)} \geq S_2 ^{(n)}$ and $2 S_1 ^{(n)} \geq 3 S_2 ^{(n)}$?

Both inequalities hold for $n = 3$. But I could not have a proof based on induction according to this base case. Anyone has a idea? Thanks very much.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Neither inequality can hold in general as the case when all the events $A_i$ are equal, shows. $\endgroup$ – Did Dec 25 '18 at 10:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Did Thanks a lot. In case that the events are not identical nor disjoint, which would be of more interest, do the inequalities hold in general? $\endgroup$ – Richie Dec 25 '18 at 11:13
  • $\begingroup$ The case of identical events serves to show that some specific condition must be added. Of course nonequal events shall also disprove the conjecture: assume for example that $P(A_i)=a$ and $P(A_i\cap A_j)=b$ for every $i$ and $j$ and consider the limit when $n\to\infty$. Once again, these trivial cases only help to show the inequality cannot hold in general. (Not sure I understand your mention of disjointness since disjoint events automatically fit the conjecture because then $S^{(n)}_2=0$.) $\endgroup$ – Did Dec 25 '18 at 12:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.