15
$\begingroup$

Let $d_1$ and $d_2$ be two metrics on the same set $X$. Then $d_1$ and $d_2$ are (topologically) equivalent if the identity maps $i:(M,d_1)\rightarrow(M,d_2)$ and $i^{-1}:(M,d_2)\rightarrow(M,d_1)$ are continuous. $d_1$ and $d_2$ are uniformly equivalent if $i$ and $i^{-1}$ are uniformly continuous. And $d_1$ and $d_2$ are strongly equivalent if there exist constants $\alpha,\beta>0$ such that $\alpha d_1(x,y)\leq d_2(x,y)\leq\beta d_1(x,y)$ for all $x,y\in X$.

All three of these are equivalence relations, so we can take equivalence classes under each one. If we take equivalence classes of metrics under equivalence, we can identify each equivalence class with a topology on $X$. If we take equivalence classes of metrics under uniform equivalence, we can identify each equivalence class with a uniformity on $X$. But my question is, if we take equivalence classes of metrics under strong equivalence, what kind of structure in $X$ can we identify each equivalence class with?

Note that I'm looking for a structure that makes no reference to metrics, just as you can define topological spaces and uniform spaces with no reference to metrics.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @SmileyCraft Thanks, I fixed it. $\endgroup$ – Keshav Srinivasan Dec 23 '18 at 4:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ They have the same metric-bornology $\mathcal{B}$, with $B \in \mathcal{B}$ iff $\exists p \in X, \exists r>0: B \subseteq B(p,r)$. You know a theorem that tells you that a bornology is induced by a metric. Maybe combine those facts? $\endgroup$ – Henno Brandsma Dec 23 '18 at 6:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @HennoBrandsma But two metrics which induce the same uniformity and the same bornology need not be strongly equivalent; see here: math.stackexchange.com/a/3050424/71829 So that means that there must be some structure beyond the uniformity and the bornology that is preserved by strong equivalence. $\endgroup$ – Keshav Srinivasan Dec 23 '18 at 17:22
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I do not think this object has any name. You can call it a bilipschitz structure. One can identify such a structure with the isomorphism class of some Banach algebra (if you like functional analysis), see msp.org/pjm/1963/13-4/pjm-v13-n4-p31-p.pdf. $\endgroup$ – Moishe Kohan Dec 27 '18 at 4:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Cross-posted to MO: mathoverflow.net/questions/319737/… $\endgroup$ – YCor Dec 30 '18 at 6:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.