I got the following question as part of a fourier-analysis course..

Consider $\phi\in C_0^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ with $\phi(0)=0$. Apparantly then we can write $$\phi =\sum_{j=1}^nx_j\psi_j $$ for functions $\psi_j$ in the same space, and I would like to prove this.

However I'm little stuck on this. The steps would involve that we start integrating $$\int_0^{x_1}D_1\phi(t,x_2,\cdots, x_n)dt+\phi(0,x_2,\cdots, x_n) $$

and continue doing so w.r.t. to the other variables, and change the interval of integration to [0,1]. Then get everything in $C_0^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ by writing $$\phi = \sum \frac{x_i^2\phi(x)}{\left\|x\right\|^2 } $$ and patch everything together with a partition of unity. I just dont quite see what they mean...A partition of unity is a sequence of functions that sums up to 1 for all $x\in \mathbb{R}^n$.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ With $C_0^{\infty}$ I mean smooth functions with compact support. $\endgroup$ – DinkyDoe Feb 21 '13 at 23:12

The result can be shown by induction on $n$.

For $n=1$, just write $\phi(x)=\int_0^x\phi'(t)dt=x\int_0^1\phi'(sx)ds$, and the map $x\mapsto \int_0^1\phi'(sx)ds$ is smooth, and has a compact support.

Assume the result is true for $n-1\geqslant 1$. We have $$\phi(x)=x_n\int_0^1\partial_n\phi(x_1,\dots,x_{n-1},tx_n)dt+\varphi(x_1,\dots,x_{n-1},0).$$ As similar argument as in the case $n=1$ shows that $(x_1,\dots,x_n)\mapsto \int_0^1\partial_n\phi(x_1,\dots,x_{n-1},tx_n)dt$ is smooth with compact support. By the induction, as $(x_1,\dots,x_{n-1})\to \phi(x_1,\dots,x_{n-1},tx_n)dt+\varphi(x_1,\dots,x_{n-1},0)$ is smooth with compact support, we can write it as $\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}x_j\psi_j(x_1,\dots,x_{n-1})$.

But it's not finished yet, as $(x_1,\dots,x_n)\mapsto \psi_j(x_1,\dots,x_{n-1})$ doesn't have a compact in $\Bbb R^n$ unless $\psi_j\equiv 0$. However, we can find a smooth function with compact support $\chi$ such that $\chi(x)=1$ whenever $x\in\operatorname{supp}(\phi)$. As $\phi(x)=\phi(x)\chi(x)$, we are done.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $C^\infty_0$ is more likely to mean vanishing at infinity than compact support. This is probably why the OP mentions partition of unity rather than a single bump function $\chi$. $\endgroup$ – user53153 Feb 21 '13 at 16:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I now see it indeed meant compact support. Thanks for checking with the OP. $\endgroup$ – user53153 Feb 22 '13 at 0:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.