1
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ and $Y$ be normed linear spaces over a scalar field, and let $T:X\to Y$ be a linear map. Then, $T$ is said to be bounded if there exists some constant $K\geq 0,$ such that \begin{align} \Vert T(x) \Vert \leq K\Vert x\Vert ,\;\;\forall\;x\in X. \end{align}

In my book here, the same definition is being given to $T$, being Lipschitz.

So, my question is: Is there any difference between a bounded linear map and a Lipschitz linear map?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There is no difference. $\endgroup$ – Kabo Murphy Dec 17 '18 at 8:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No. In the case of linear operators, those definition coincide. More interesting is the case of of nonlinear operators. $\endgroup$ – Jonas Dec 17 '18 at 8:24
1
$\begingroup$

No, there is no difference. If $T:X\to Y$ is linear, then

$T$ is bounded $ \iff T$ is Lipschitz.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.