I have been reading the Wikipedia page on the Quadrifolium there are two of them:

\begin{eqnarray*} r &=& \sin 2\theta \\ (x^2 + y^2)^3 &=& 4 x^2 y^2 \end{eqnarray*}

and it's $45^\circ$-rotated version, which is also a rose curve:

\begin{eqnarray*} r &=& \cos 2\theta\\ (x^2 + y^2)^3 &=& (x^2 - y^2)^2 \\ \end{eqnarray*}

These equations also have a $(x,y)$-parameterization, which can be found with some algebra.

\begin{eqnarray*} x &=& \cos k \theta \cos \theta = \tfrac{1}{4}\big[ e^{i(k+1)\theta} + e^{i(k-1)\theta} + e^{-i(k-1)\theta} + e^{-i(k+1)\theta} \big] \\ y &=& \cos k \theta \sin \theta \,= \tfrac{1}{4}\big[ e^{i(k+1)\theta} - e^{i(k-1)\theta} + e^{-i(k-1)\theta} - e^{-i(k+1)\theta} \big] \\ \end{eqnarray*}

And $\cos k (\theta + \phi)$ for a rotated version. Here $\theta = 0, \frac{\pi}{4}$ and $k = 2$.

Here is the picture of the quadrifolium, a kind of rose curve, and when it's rotated.

The reason I am going to look at this question again, is because I wanted to study the rational paramterization. Let $X$ be our curve, with a singular point at the origin $(0,0)$. We're trying to describe $X(\mathbb{Q})$.

The curve on the left right has no rational points.

Naively, if I divide one equation by the other, I get an expression for the tangent function. In fact, $\frac{x}{y} = \tan \theta$ for all values of $\theta \in [0, 2\pi]$ just as if it were a circle. Let's define a map:

$$ \big[ (x,y) = (\cos \theta, \sin \theta) \big] \mapsto \Big[ ( (2x^2 - 1 )x, (1 - 2y^2) y) = ( (2 \cos^2 \theta - 1) \cos \theta , (1 - 2\sin^2 \theta)\sin \theta ) \Big] $$

And we have that $LHS \in \mathbb{Q}$ if $RHS \in \mathbb{Q}$. Is this sufficient? Is this map birational, is this enough for a paramerization?

Here is even another strategy, since we have Fourier series (even just trigonometric series because there are only 4 terms).

$$ \left[ \begin{array}{c} x \\ y \end{array}\right] = \left[ \begin{array}{c} e^{3i\theta} + e^{i\theta} + e^{-i\theta} + e^{-3i\theta} \\ e^{3i\theta} - e^{i\theta} + e^{-i\theta} - e^{-3i\theta}\end{array} \right] = \left[ \begin{array}{rrrr} 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & -1 & 1 & -1 \end{array} \right] \left[ \begin{array}{c} e^{3i\theta} \\ e^{i\theta} \\ e^{-i\theta} \\ e^{-3i\theta} \end{array} \right] $$

Or we could even try a different approach using the triple-angle formulas of trigonometry:

\begin{eqnarray*} \cos 3\theta &=& 4 \cos^3 \theta - 3 \cos \theta \\ \sin 3\theta &=& 3 \sin \theta - 4 \sin^3 \theta \\ \tan 3\theta &=& \frac{3 \tan \theta - \tan^3 \theta}{1 - 3 \tan^2 \theta} \end{eqnarray*}

Now these are reading as a degree-map from the circle to another algebraic variety (or scheme). In that case, why does the angle $3\theta$ appear in a 4-fold symmetric curve?

These singularities could be studied by Netwton's method (e.g. Puiseux series or resolution of singularities). Unfortunatley I could never get the jargon straight about the exceptional divisor and so forth. E.g. the strategy here to rationalize the lemniscate seems to amount to computing a blow-up of the curve. At this point I am going to consult an algebraic geometry textbook.

Example What is the "derivative" or tangent space at the origin $(0,0)$ ?

  • $\begingroup$ "The curve on the left has no rational points." I can see $5$ rational points without even computing anything. $\endgroup$ – Servaes Dec 12 '18 at 17:16
  • $\begingroup$ Also, I have no idea what your question is, what curves you are talking about when, or what you are doing with them. For example; "Naively, if I divide one equation by the other, I get an expression for the tangent function." Which equations do you mean? And the tangent function of what? $\endgroup$ – Servaes Dec 12 '18 at 17:19
  • $\begingroup$ @Servaes Thanks... the curve in the picture on the right should have no rational points. And I am asking for a parameterization of all the rational curves on the left. E.g. for a circle $t \mapsto (\frac{2t}{1+t^2}, \frac{1-t^2}{1+t^2})$ is a map from $\mathbb{Q}$ to the circle $x^2 + y^2 = 1$. I spend the rest of the article proposing different strategies for these rose curves. $\endgroup$ – cactus314 Dec 12 '18 at 17:26
  • $\begingroup$ What rational curves on "the left"? What left? And where does this $k$ in your parametrizations come from? $\endgroup$ – Servaes Dec 12 '18 at 17:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ (+1) interesting question. Let $G(x,y) = (x^2+y^2)^3 - (x^2-y^2)^2$. With help of a CAS, I find $G(X(s),Y(s)) = 0$ for following parameterization of the curve $$\begin{cases}X(s) &= (2-2s)M(s)\\Y(s) &= (2s-s^2)M(s)\end{cases} \quad\text{ where }\quad M(s) = \frac{(2-s^2)(2-4s+s^2)}{(2-2s+s^2)^3}$$ The derivation is a real mess, so this better stay as a comment rather than an answer ;-p $\endgroup$ – achille hui Dec 12 '18 at 18:20

You may want to find a parametrization like $(x, y) = (f_1(t), f_2(t))$ for some nonconstant rational functions $f_1(t), f_2(t)\in \mathbb{Q}(t)$. Until now, I can show you that there's no such parametrization with $f_1(t), f_2(t)\in \mathbb{Q}[t]$ (i.e. both are polynomial with rational coefficients).

If such parametrization exists, we should have $x^{2} - y^{2} = f(t)^{3}$ and $x^{2} + y^{2} = f(t)^{2}$ for some $f(t)\in \mathbb{Q}[t]$. Then $$ y^{2} = \frac{1}{2}f(t)^{2}(1-f(t)), $$ so $\frac{1}{2}(1-f(t)) = g(t)^{2}\Leftrightarrow f(t) = 1-2g(t)^{2}$ for some $g(t)\in \mathbb{Q}[t]$. Then $$x^{2} = \frac{1}{2}(f(t)^{2} + f(t)^{3}) =(1-2g(t)^{2})^{2}(1-g(t)^{2})$$ Now $\mathrm{gcd}(1-2g(t)^{2}, 1-g(t)^{2}) = 1$, so we should have $1-g(t)^{2} = h_{1}(t)^{2}$ and $1-2g(t)^{2} =h_{2}(t)^{2}$ for some $h_{1}, h_{2}\in \mathbb{Q}[t]$. By the way, this give $2h_{1}(t)^{2} -h_{2}(t)^{2} = 1$, which is impossible if we see the first coefficients of $h_{1}, h_{2}$, unless they are constant. I think we can use the same argument in case of rational functions, too. (I'm not sure)


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.