0
$\begingroup$

I have to check whether the following claims are true or false:

Let $V$ be a vector space of finite dimension, and let $U, W$ be subspaces of $V$.

1) If $\dim V > \dim U + \dim W$, then $V \neq U + W $

2) If $ \dim V > \dim U + \dim W$, then $ U\cap W = 0_v$

I have been struggling with this material since we first started it.

From what I can gather, the first one is correct, but this is only based on my intuition.

For the second claim, what I think is:

We know that $\dim (U +W) = \dim U + \dim W - \dim (U \cap W)$.

Combining this with the information we have from the claim, we can assume:

$\dim (U \cap W)= 0$.

Therefore $ U \cap W = {0v} $.

Is this a valid way of proofing?

Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$
  1. Suppose that $U\cap W=\{0\}$. Then, if $B_U$ is a basis of $U$ and $B_W$ is a basis of $W$, then $B_U\cup B_W$ is linearly independent and therefore\begin{align}\dim V&\geqslant\#(B_U\cup B_W)\\&=\#B_U+\#B_W\\&=\dim U+\dim W.\end{align}And if $U\cap W\neq\{0\}$. Let $B_{U\cap W}$ be a basis of $U\cap W$, and extend it to a basis $B_U$ of $U$ and to a basis $B_W$ of $W$. Then\begin{align}\dim V&\geqslant\#(B_U\cup B_W)\\&=\#B_U+\#B_W-\#B_{U\cap W}\\&>\dim U+\dim W.\end{align}
  2. The statement is false. Let $V=\mathbb{R}^3$, let $v\in V\setminus\{0\}$ and let $U=W=\mathbb{R}v$. Then$$3=\dim V>1+1=\dim U+\dim W,$$but $U\cap W\neq\{0\}$.
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What does the $#$ symbol represent here? $\endgroup$ – Tegernako Dec 12 '18 at 15:23
  • $\begingroup$ It stands for cardinal. $\endgroup$ – José Carlos Santos Dec 12 '18 at 15:24
  • $\begingroup$ I see, we have not used those terms when we studied, but I'll try to translate the same idea with the dimensions theorem we studied. Thank you very much. $\endgroup$ – Tegernako Dec 12 '18 at 15:33
  • $\begingroup$ For the first question, you can just say $\dim V > \dim U + \dim W \ge \dim(U+W)$. $\endgroup$ – Najib Idrissi Dec 12 '18 at 15:35
  • $\begingroup$ @NajibIdrissi Of course, but I assumed that the OP was not aware of the fact that $\dim(U+W)\leqslant\dim U+\dim W$. With that knowledge, the problem becomes trivial. $\endgroup$ – José Carlos Santos Dec 12 '18 at 15:37
1
$\begingroup$

There is a contradiction example for the second statement. suppose $dim(V) = 10$ and $(U \cup W) \subset V$ and $U$ and $V$ have intersection with each other such that $U = W$ and $dim(U) = dim(W) = 1$, but not $U \cap W = 0_V$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I see, thanks. Suppse this was the other way around, I mean if $dimV < dimU + dimW$, therefore $ U \cap W \neq {0} $ was necessarily true, from definitions and what we have, right? $\endgroup$ – Tegernako Dec 12 '18 at 15:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.