0
$\begingroup$

Let $f:(0,1) \to \mathbb{R}$ be a given function. Explain how the following definition is not equivalent to the definition of the limit

$\lim\limits_{x \to x_0} f(x) = L$

of $f$ at $x_0 \in [0,1]$ .

For any $\epsilon \gt 0$ there exists $\delta \gt 0$ such that for all $x \in (0,1)$ and $|x-x_0| \leq \delta$, one has $|f(x) - L| < \varepsilon$ .

I don't see the difference between this definition and the actual definition of the limit of a function. Could someone help me out with this?

Please and thank you.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You have to exclude $x=x_0$, that's why the standard definition has $0<|x-x_0|≤\delta$. If, say, your function is $f(x)=1$ for $x\neq \frac 12$ and $f\left( \frac 12\right) =0$ then $\lim_{x\to \frac 12}f(x)=1$ with the usual definition, but not with your definition. $\endgroup$ – lulu Dec 11 '18 at 0:56
  • $\begingroup$ Wait so do you mean to say that it’s suppose to be $0 \lt |x- x_0| \lt \delta$ And not less than or equal to delta? $\endgroup$ – ISuckAtMathPleaseHELPME Dec 11 '18 at 18:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That's not a meaningful difference. Think it through...you can always modify $\delta$ according to which definition you favor. But the $>0$ requirement has real meaning. $\endgroup$ – lulu Dec 11 '18 at 19:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.