21
$\begingroup$

I am interested in the following question:

Does there exist a continuous function $f:S^2\to S^2$ such that, for any $p\in S^2$, $|f^{-1}(\{p\})|=2$?

I suspect the answer is no, but I don't know how to prove it. All I know right now is that $f$ cannot be a covering map.

For if $f$ is a covering map, take any $p\in S^2$. Then $f$ restricts to a covering map from $S^2\backslash f^{-1}(p)$ to $S^2\backslash \{p\}$. However, the fundamental group of $S^2\backslash f^{-1}(p)$ is $\mathbb{Z}$ and the fundamental group of $S^2\backslash \{p\}$ is trivial. That $f$ is a covering then gives that there is an injective homomorphism from $\mathbb{Z}$ to the trivial group, a contradiction. Thus $f$ cannot be a covering map.

That's all I've got so far. Any more progress is greatly appreciated.

Update (Dec 21, 2018): I've posted this question on MO

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't know much topology, but here's an idea: if you take $f^{-1}$ to be continuous as well, then $f$ would be a homeomorphism from some connected subset of the sphere to itself. However, a sphere partitions $3$-space into two parts, and no connected subset of a sphere partitions $3$-space into two parts (because, non-rigorously speaking, it must have a hole). $\endgroup$ – Frpzzd Dec 18 '18 at 0:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ We know that $f$ cannot be a covering map. This leaves the question whether your function $f$ must be a covering map. The answers by Florentin MB and SmileyCraft are have gaps. Florentin MB cannot show that $f$ is locally injective and SmileyCraft assumes that $f$ is open. The arguments used in these answers cannot be sufficient because they are of a very general nature and do not invoke special features of $S^2$. This is shown by yoyo's comment where you can find a continuous function $f : S^1 \to S^1$ which is not a covering although preimages of points contain two points $\endgroup$ – Paul Frost Dec 18 '18 at 14:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Related: mathoverflow.net/questions/17707/… $\endgroup$ – Dap Dec 20 '18 at 14:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ See my answer at MathOverflow. $\endgroup$ – GH from MO Dec 23 '18 at 2:17
10
$\begingroup$

EDIT: the argument is incomplete. As pointed in the comments by yoyo, the separation of the pre-images is not guaranteed by the compactness.

There is no such map.

For is there is, I prove below that it has to be a covering map and you proved that it is not possible (or simply remark that from the fact that $S^2$ is simply connected, it admits no non-trivial covering).

Let's assume $f$ satisfies your hypothesis. By compactness of $S^2$, there exists a $\varepsilon>0$ such that for all $p \in S^2$, for all $x \neq y \in f^{-1}(p)$ we have $d(x,y) \ge 2 \varepsilon$ (where $d$ is any compatible metric on the sphere). Consequently, for any $x \in S^2$, if $U$ is the closed ball centered at $x$ and radius $\varepsilon$ then the restriction of $f$ to $U$ is injective, and by compactness, an homeomorphism onto its image.

We've shown that $f$ is a local homeomorphism, and by hypothesis it is surjective. As its domain is compact and its range connected, it is a covering.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Could you please explain how compactness lead us to the fact $d(x,y) \ge 2 \varepsilon$? $\endgroup$ – yoyo Dec 11 '18 at 13:47
  • $\begingroup$ @yoyo In fact, a uniform $\varepsilon$ is not needed (but it is true). I edited the answer. $\endgroup$ – Florentin MB Dec 11 '18 at 14:14
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry that I still can't understand how you deduced the fact that the restriction of $f$ to $U$ is injective. $\endgroup$ – yoyo Dec 11 '18 at 14:43
  • $\begingroup$ @yoyo I believe the idea is that the diameter of the preimages of $f$ is a positive continuous function on $S^2$, and since that's a compact domain, it is bounded below by some uniform positive constant. That is the chosen $\epsilon$ $\endgroup$ – Balarka Sen Dec 11 '18 at 14:53
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ EX:$g:S^1\to S^1$, $g(\theta)=2\theta$ if $0 \le \theta \le \pi$ and $g(\theta)=-2 (\pi + \theta)$ if $-\pi \le \theta \le 0$, which satisfies $|g^{-1}(\{\theta\})|=2$ for all $\theta \in S^1$ but $S^1$ is compact and the $inf$ of the diameters of the preimages of $g$ is $0$. $\endgroup$ – yoyo Dec 11 '18 at 15:26
2
+50
$\begingroup$

If I understand correctly, Florentin MB's answer will be complete if we can prove that $f$ is locally injective. Feel free to tell me if I'm wrong here, but I think we can at least show that $f$ is locally injective if $f$ is open. It seems to me that $f$ should be open, but I don't know how to prove that.

Let $x\in S^2$ and $f(x)=f(y)$ for $x\neq y$. Then let $U$ and $V$ be disjoint opens such that $x\in U$ and $y\in V$. If $f$ is open, then $f(U)$ and $f(V)$ are open, so $W:=f(U)\cap f(V)$ is open. Now for every $w\in W$ there exist $u\in U$ and $v\in V$ such that $f(u)=f(v)=w$. Because $U$ and $V$ are disjoint, we find $u\neq v$, so because $|f^{-1}(\{w\})|=2$, we find $f^{-1}(\{w\})=\{u,v\}$. Hence, we find $f^{-1}(W)\subset U\cup V$. Because $f$ is continuous, $f^{-1}(W)$ is open, so $N:=f^{-1}(W)\cap U$ is open. Notice that $x\in N$, so $N$ is a neighborhood of $x$. Finally, $f$ is injective in $N$, because for all $n\in N$ we have $f(n)\in W$. This gives $f^{-1}(\{f(n)\})=\{n,v\}$ for some $v\in V$, and $U$ and $V$ are disjoint, so $v\not\in U$.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If it should be possible to prove that $f$ is open, then it must be based on special features of $S^2$. See yoyo's example of a function $f : S^1 \to S^1$ which is not open. $\endgroup$ – Paul Frost Dec 18 '18 at 14:18
  • $\begingroup$ Right, so its probably not making things any easier... $\endgroup$ – SmileyCraft Dec 18 '18 at 16:40

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.