Suppose $P(x): \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ is always a positive definite matrix, does it imply that the infimum (over $\mathbb{R}$) of the minimum eigenvalue of $P(x)$ is always positive?, that is, $\inf_{x \in \mathbb{R}} \{\lambda_{{\rm min}}(P(x)) \} > 0$ In a mathematical way:

Is the following conclusion correct? \begin{equation} \forall x \in \mathbb{R},\;P(x) \succ 0 \implies \inf_{x \in \mathbb{R}} \{\lambda_{{\rm min}}(P(x)) \} > 0 \end{equation}

Please be careful with the infimum.

Please go to the other similar question here, which is exactly the real (and more difficult in my opinion) question that I want to ask.


No. Consider $n=1$ and $P(x)=e^x$ or in general, $P(x)=e^{xI_n}$.

  • $\begingroup$ I think it should be $P(x)=e^{-x}$. $\endgroup$ – winston Dec 7 '18 at 10:59
  • $\begingroup$ @winston $e^x$ is OK. It is always positive and $e^x\to0$ when $x\to-\infty$. $\endgroup$ – user1551 Dec 7 '18 at 11:00
  • $\begingroup$ Yes,you are right. $\endgroup$ – winston Dec 7 '18 at 11:01
  • $\begingroup$ Actually my intended question is more difficult. Can you go to this math.stackexchange.com/questions/3029778/… $\endgroup$ – winston Dec 7 '18 at 11:07

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.