I came up with an intuitive conjecture about boundaries of surfaces based on the idea that at a boundary point we can wrap a string across the edge, and the two halves of the string (on opposite sides of the surface) can be brought as close as we want:

Let $S \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ be a surface. A point $P \in S$ is a boundary point iff there is a point $Q \in S \setminus \{P\}$ such that for all $\epsilon>0$, there are functions $\mathbf{f}, \mathbf{g} : [0,1] \to \mathbb{R}^n$ such that:

  1. $\mathbf{f}(0) = \mathbf{g}(0)$ and $||\mathbf{f}(0) - P|| < \epsilon$ (string halves touch at a point close to $P$)
  2. $\forall t \in [0,1]: ||\mathbf{f}(t)-\mathbf{g}(t)|| < \epsilon$ (string halves are close to each other)
  3. $\forall t \in [0,1]: ||\mathbf{f}(t) - P|| > \epsilon \implies \frac{\mathbf{f}(t) + \mathbf{g}(t)}{2} \in S$ (string halves are separated by surface, except near $P$)
  4. $||\mathbf{f}(1) - Q|| < \epsilon$ and $||\mathbf{g}(1) - Q|| < \epsilon$ (string ends are close to $Q$)
  5. $(\mathbf{f}([0,1]) \cup \mathbf{g}([0,1])) \cap S = \emptyset$ (string doesn't pass through the surface)

Is this conjecture correct? Does it have any useful applications? Is this a known theorem?


I presume that by "surface" you mean a 2-dimensional submanifold, in which case this conjecture is incorrect when $n \ge 4$: Your property is true for all $P \in S$, not just for boundary points.

On the other hand, I think the conjecture is true when $n=3$. I also think the conjecture would be true if, rather than assuming that $S$ is 2-dimensional, you assume instead that $S$ is of dimension $n-1$.

A version of this property can be used to prove the theorem that if $S \subset \mathbb R^3$ is a 2-dimensional subsurface-with-boundary, if $S$ is connected, and if $\partial S \ne \emptyset$, then $\mathbb R^3 - S$ is path connected. But for this application you must prove the property for any $Q$ in $S$, instead of just for some $Q$. If you look up proofs of this theorem, you'll see objects similar to your two paths $\bf f$, $\bf g$.


Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.