1
$\begingroup$

Find a metric $d$ on $\mathbb{N}$ such that for any $n \in \mathbb{N}$ and any $\epsilon >0$ there exists an $m \in \mathbb{N},m\neq n$ such that $d(n,m)<\epsilon$.

From this definition, all the numbers are the limits of some sequence in the set $\mathbb{N}$. But how could this be? How could all the elements be arbitrarily close to each other but not equal at the same time?

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ It doesn't say any two, only that if you start with one (call it $a$) you can find some $b$ with $d(a,b)< \epsilon.$ $\endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Dec 7, 2018 at 1:04
  • $\begingroup$ It's not the same $m$ for every $\epsilon$ $\endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Dec 7, 2018 at 1:05
  • $\begingroup$ "all the numbers are the limits of some sequence in the set N." That's fine. Why would that be a problem? "How could all the elements be arbitrarily close to each other" They aren't. All numbers have some numbers arbitrarily close but not all of them. $\endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Dec 7, 2018 at 1:09
  • $\begingroup$ Am I missing something or can't we just pick $m=n$, as $d(m,n)=0$ $\endgroup$
    – user370967
    Dec 7, 2018 at 7:51
  • $\begingroup$ @Math_QED Yes but that seems to be the trivial answer. The question is asking for something more intelligent I suppose. I edited it to be clearer $\endgroup$
    – Bunbury
    Dec 7, 2018 at 18:31

4 Answers 4

2
$\begingroup$

Set up a bijection mapping the natural numbers to the positive rationals. Then pull back the metric from the positive rationals to the positive naturals

Produce an explicit bijection between rationals and naturals?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

The rational numbers are countable. Let $f$ be a bijection from the natural number to the rationals and define $d(m,n) = |f(m)-f(n)|$. Since the metric on the rationals has the property you wish, so does this translation to the natural numbers. This is not a very nice metric.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Hint: You may not necessarily be able to find a sequence such that the epsilon condition could be met. Epsilons are everywhere in Analysis, but it’s not always a sequence.

It’s helpful to think of the epsilon condition as a bound on the metric: the lower bound is $\epsilon >0$, for any $\epsilon$. Essentially make it as small as possible - $\inf \epsilon = 0$, so one essentially has to force the metric to align to this condition.

The metric has to take 2 natural numbers, and make the result 0, in some way.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

A different, more explicit approach:
Choose some irrational number $c$. For real $x$, let $f(x)$ be the distance from $x$ to the nearest integer; this ranges from $0$ at the integers to $\frac12$ at the midpoints between them.
Then $d(m,n)=f(cm-cn)$ is a metric satisfying these properties. By a pigeonhole argument, for any positive integer $N$, we can always find some $n<N$ with $f(cn)\le \frac1N$.

In essence, we sprinkle the integers around a circle, and pull back distances from there. Because $c$ is irrational, we never repeat a point, and the points are dense in the circle.

Many variations on this theme are possible. For one of the simplest to write down, there's $d(m,n)=|\sin(m-n)|$ (angles measured in radians).

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .