1
$\begingroup$

Say I have a graph G and I want to sum some constant C (like the minimum degree of the graph) for every vertex. Can I use the following notation? $$\sum_{x \in V(G)}C $$

Is this an appropriate way to use sigma notation? There is a similar question here Notation of the summation of a set of numbers but it doesn't account for the fact that the expression could be a constant. A person I am working with questioned it and I couldn't find any resources where it is used in this manner. I don't see why it would be improper because you could have an expression like $\sum_{i=1}^{n}C$. Thank you

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It looks logically correct, but why wouldn't you just write $\lvert V(G)\rvert \cdot C$? $\endgroup$ – David K Dec 6 '18 at 22:03
  • $\begingroup$ We do at some point in our proof. We actually use this notation and the equation that @gt6989b posted. $\endgroup$ – rachelhoward Dec 6 '18 at 22:09
  • $\begingroup$ OK, I could imagine your notation as an intermediate step while simplifying some other sum where you can separate out a constant term. Some authors would skip that intermediate step and go straight to the the multiplication but I think that is something you can decide not do to if you think it's helpful to show the intermediate step explicitly. $\endgroup$ – David K Dec 6 '18 at 22:16
2
$\begingroup$

Indeed, you are correct, you can use $\sum_{x \in S} C$ for any set $S$ and constant $C$, and since $C$ does not depend on $x$, this simplifies to $$ \sum_{x \in S} C = C \cdot |S|, $$ for any finite set $S$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.