5
$\begingroup$

Consider the following initial value problem (IVP) to the first order ODE:

$$\tag{1} \dot x = f(t, x), \ \ \ x(t_0) = x_0.$$

The Existence and Uniqueness Theorem describes when one has exactly one solutions. This is true (e.g.) when $f$ is continuously differentiable.

There are examples where uniqueness fails and existence fails (here or here):

In all of the examples where I am aware of, whenever one has more than one solutions, one actually has infinitely many. Hence my question:

Can an IVP has more than one solutions, but only finitely many solutions?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I am new to this topic , so i will add more details of what i try if i got some ideas $\endgroup$ – Cloud JR Dec 5 '18 at 16:28
  • $\begingroup$ How about $(y')^2=1$ with $y(0)=0$? The two solutions are $y=x$ and $y=-x$. $\endgroup$ – Barry Cipra Dec 5 '18 at 16:31
  • $\begingroup$ @BarryCipra thanks, but what about first order differential equaltion? $\endgroup$ – Cloud JR Dec 5 '18 at 16:35
  • $\begingroup$ I don't why there is a negative vote! $\endgroup$ – Cloud JR Dec 5 '18 at 16:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @gt6989b, OK, I was going by a restricted definition of "first-order." It does seem clear, from the comments, that the OP is interested in the explicit variety, so the exercise suggested in Artem's answer would seem to be of interest. $\endgroup$ – Barry Cipra Dec 5 '18 at 16:51
5
$\begingroup$

The answer is positive: in general (apart of some artificial examples) if an IVP for an ODE $$ \dot x=f(t,x),\quad x(t)\in \mathbb R^n $$ have non unique solution it implies that there are uncountably many solutions. In these general setting this is a very nontrivial theorem which can be found in Hartman's book (Kneser's theorem). If, however, you are dealing with an ODE $$ \dot x=f(t,x),\quad x(0)=x_0, $$ where $x(t)$ is one-dimensional, it is a good (and simple) exercise to prove that if there are two solutions to this problem then there are infinitely (uncountably) many solutions.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Well, i will try your exercise! $\endgroup$ – Cloud JR Dec 5 '18 at 16:48
  • $\begingroup$ @CloudJR Assume that there are two solutions. Draw a picture. Conclude. $\endgroup$ – Artem Dec 5 '18 at 17:04
  • $\begingroup$ I tried but its not that easy, i'm still stuck...lol $\endgroup$ – Cloud JR Dec 5 '18 at 17:44
  • $\begingroup$ Could you point me to those artificial examples? I'd love to see exactly how one can break this theorem $\endgroup$ – Isaac Browne Jun 19 at 20:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.