I just received the book "single digits - In praise of Small Numbers" by Marc Chamberland.

In this book, he gives an interesting integral

$$\displaystyle \int_0^\infty \dfrac{\sin x}{x} = \dfrac{\pi}{2}$$

$$\displaystyle \int_0^\infty \dfrac{\sin(x)}{x}\dfrac{\sin(x/3)}{x/3} = \dfrac{\pi}{2}$$

$$\displaystyle \int_0^\infty \dfrac{\sin(x)}{x}\dfrac{\sin(x/3)}{x/3}\dfrac{\sin(x/5)}{x/5} = \dfrac{\pi}{2}$$

$$\displaystyle \int_0^\infty \dfrac{\sin(x)}{x}\dfrac{\sin(x/3)}{x/3}\dfrac{\sin(x/5)}{x/5}\dfrac{\sin(x/7)}{x/7} = \dfrac{\pi}{2}$$

$$\displaystyle \int_0^\infty \dfrac{\sin(x)}{x}\dfrac{\sin(x/3)}{x/3}\dfrac{\sin(x/5)}{x/5}\dfrac{\sin(x/7)}{x/7} \dfrac{\sin(x/9)}{x/9}= \dfrac{\pi}{2}$$

$$\displaystyle \int_0^\infty \dfrac{\sin(x)}{x}\dfrac{\sin(x/3)}{x/3}\dfrac{\sin(x/5)}{x/5}\dfrac{\sin(x/7)}{x/7} \dfrac{\sin(x/9)}{x/9}\dfrac{\sin(x/11)}{x/11}= \dfrac{\pi}{2}$$

$$\displaystyle \int_0^\infty \dfrac{\sin(x)}{x}\dfrac{\sin(x/3)}{x/3}\dfrac{\sin(x/5)}{x/5}\dfrac{\sin(x/7)}{x/7} \dfrac{\sin(x/9)}{x/9}\dfrac{\sin(x/11)}{x/11}\dfrac{\sin(x/13)}{x/13} = \dfrac{\pi}{2}$$

At this point, it is tempting to speculate that this pattern goes on forever, but we run into problems and this is another example of jumping to conclusions too soon.

$$\displaystyle \int_0^\infty \dfrac{\sin(x)}{x}\dfrac{\sin(x/3)}{x/3}\dfrac{\sin(x/5)}{x/5}\dfrac{\sin(x/7)}{x/7} \dfrac{\sin(x/9)}{x/9}\dfrac{\sin(x/11)}{x/11}\dfrac{\sin(x/13)}{x/13}\dfrac{\sin(x/15)}{x/15} = \dfrac{467807924713440738696537864469 \pi }{935615849440640907310521750000}$$

I calculated the next several and they are nice approximations to the results above, but not that result

  • $$\dfrac{17708695183056190642497315530628422295569865119 \pi }{35417390788301195294898352987527510935040000000}$$
  • $$\dfrac{8096799621940897567828686854312535486311061114550605367511653 \pi }{16193600755941299921751838065715269433640150152124763150000000}$$
  • $$\dfrac{2051563935160591194337436768610392837217226815379395891838337765936509 \pi }{4103129007448718822870650414175026723860506854636748901313920000000000}$$

  • $$\dfrac{37193167701690492344448194533283488902041049236760438302965167901187323851384840067287863 \pi }{74386376780038719358535506076609218130495936637120586884474907521986965251324791250000000}$$

He states "The explanation for this change is a bit technical, but the critical reason is that $\dfrac{1}{3} + \dfrac{1}{5} + \ldots + \dfrac{1}{13} \lt 1$, whereas, adding the next term $\frac{1}{15}$ pushes the sum over $1$, making a difference in the value of the integral."

He does not mention the researcher, but I'd like to know what is a "bit technical" explanation or if there is a more analytical or mathematical rationale or a reference to the research?

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ This is an interesting example of "jumping to a conclusion." (+1) $\endgroup$ – Mark Viola Dec 4 '18 at 16:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A derivation of the integral is given on Wiki::Borwein integral which explains the result (i.e. why it suddenly fails to hold true once the sum of some series gets large enough) $\endgroup$ – Winther Dec 4 '18 at 17:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A paper in the same spirit (formulas that holds for the first $N$ integers and then suddenly fails) might also be of interest "Fun with large numbers" by R. Baillie. $\endgroup$ – Winther Dec 4 '18 at 17:05
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Winther Hi Hans. Happy Holidays. Thank you for the comments and embedded references! Much appreciated. -Mark $\endgroup$ – Mark Viola Dec 4 '18 at 19:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There's a variant of this identity that holds until 15,341,178,777,673,149,429,167,740,440,969,249,338,310,888 but fails at the next numbers :) see here. $\endgroup$ – Arnaud D. Dec 4 '18 at 19:39

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.