0
$\begingroup$

I have the subspaces:

$$S = \langle(2,1,-1), (-1,2,0)\rangle, \qquad T = \{ X + Y + 2Z =0; X - Y - Z = 0\}.$$

I got that $T = \langle(1, 3,-2)\rangle$.

All vectors are linearly independent, so $S + T = \mathbb{R}^3.$ Then I tried to calculate the orthogonal complement for both.

It is my understanding that the orthogonal complement for $S$ should give a vector that is a multiple of $(1,3,-2)$ (generates the same subspace as $T$) and the orthogonal complement for $T$ should give vectors that are linearly dependent from the ones in $S$ (generates the same subspace).

However, complement of $S = t(2,1,3)$ from my calculations, and complement of $T = t(-3,1,0) + s(2,0,1)$.

What I did was resolving the system

$$2x + y - z = 0 \\ - x + 2y = 0$$

For $S$, and for $T$:

$$x + 3y - 2z = 0 .$$

Am I doing something wrong?

Edit: Maybe I'm understanding wrong a part of the theory, but I read that $S$ and its orthogonal complement will generate $\mathbb{R}^n$. The orthogonal complement for T is indeed resulting in $0$ for the scalar product. But if $\dim(S) + \dim(S^\bot) = 3$, and $\dim(S) + \dim(T) = 3$, shouldn't $T$ and $S^\bot$ be the same subspace?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $S^\perp=\{(2,1,5)\}$ and $T^\perp=\{(1,1,2)\}$. Orthogonal complements need not be unique. $\endgroup$ – Yadati Kiran Nov 22 '18 at 13:45
1
$\begingroup$

There is absolutely no reason why a vector orthogonal to $S$ should be an element of $T$. This would be true if $T$ were actually the orthogonal complement of $S$, but it is not. Clearly $(1,3,-2)$ is not orthogonal to $S$.

You seem to believe that a complement of $S$ is unique. It is not the case (take the line generated by any vector outside $S$).

PS. Note that your calculations for the complement of $S$ are certainly wrong, since the vector you obtain is not orthogonal to the generators of $S$...

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Please see my edit $\endgroup$ – JorgeeFG Nov 22 '18 at 13:43
  • $\begingroup$ Your example shows that the answer to your edit is NO. Once again, $T$ is NOT the orthogonal complement of $S$ because it is NOT orthogonal to $S$. Ypu have infinitely many possible complements for $S$. $\endgroup$ – GreginGre Nov 22 '18 at 13:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.