0
$\begingroup$

Motivation:

This is inspired by this question.

The Question:

What is the maximum volume that can be enclosed by folding a square piece of paper (with side length $\ell$) using only (rigid) Origami moves?

Thoughts:

I found this, but it's not very helpful because it doesn't give a specific volume and I can't find the paper it references.

It's not a question I think I can answer myself. I have no formal training in Origami and know very little about it.

I'm guessing the shape is just a cube but I'm not sure how to prove that.

Please help :)

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It seems you want a closed (convex?) polyhedron whereas the linked question concerns an open "dish". If so, see Alexander, Dyson, and O'Rourke, "The Foldings of a Square to Convex Polyhedra, 2002. $\endgroup$ – Rahul Nov 18 '18 at 19:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The ref it pointed to is a book (I've a hard copy of that). In the book, it say the volume is about $0.056$ which is about $60$% of the volume of a unit-area sphere. $\endgroup$ – achille hui Nov 18 '18 at 19:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ yes, it is that book. $\endgroup$ – achille hui Nov 18 '18 at 19:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ that result is for a unit square. i.e. $\ell = 1$. $\endgroup$ – achille hui Nov 18 '18 at 19:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The same result is included in the paper I linked to (Joseph O'Rourke is a coauthor of both), and the paper is freely available via O'Rourke's webpage. $\endgroup$ – Rahul Nov 19 '18 at 5:23
0
$\begingroup$

In order to close the question, here is a community wiki answer from the comments.

The ref it pointed to is a book (I've a hard copy of that). In the book, it say the volume is about $0.056$ which is about $60\%$ of the volume of a unit-area sphere.

This is by achille hui, Nov 18 at 19:31.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @achillehui, I'll leave this here until you post the answer yourself. $\endgroup$ – Shaun Nov 24 '18 at 3:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I won't post any answer. Joseph O'Rourke is a user on math.SE. If he ever see this question, he can provide an answer with much more details... $\endgroup$ – achille hui Nov 24 '18 at 3:59
  • $\begingroup$ Well, until that day, @achillehui, this answer should suffice. $\endgroup$ – Shaun Nov 24 '18 at 4:01
  • $\begingroup$ In fact, here's a tag for @JosephO'Rouke. I hope he doesn't mind this comment $\ddot\smile$. $\endgroup$ – Shaun Nov 24 '18 at 4:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Tagging a general user won't work. The system will only notify the user if he/she has interacted with a page before. $\endgroup$ – achille hui Nov 24 '18 at 4:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.