Let $p$ be a prime number, let $\mathbb{Q}_p$ be the local field, by Hensel's lemma, we know it has $p-1$-th roots of unity, let $\zeta$ be a fixed primitive $p-1$-th root of unity in $\mathbb{Q}_p$.

Let $a,b\in\mathbb{Q}_p^*$, let $(a,b)_{\zeta}$ be the cyclic algebra defined by $\mathbb{Q}_p\langle x,y|x^{p-1}=a,y^{p-1}=b, xy=\zeta yx\rangle$.

Is there an explicit way to tell which class $[(a,b)_\zeta]\in\mathrm{Br}(\mathbb{Q}_p)=\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$ is? (For example, when $a,b\in\mathbb{Q}$, how does the two rational numbers determine an element in $\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$?)

  • $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_symbol $\endgroup$ – Qiaochu Yuan Nov 13 '18 at 22:49
  • $\begingroup$ @QiaochuYuan Thanks! But for example how could one calculate $(2,3)_5$ explicitly? $\endgroup$ – Qixiao Nov 14 '18 at 17:15
  • $\begingroup$ @QiaochuYuan Sorry this may be a stupid question, but I feel confused: from the wikipedia description, the Hilbert symbol is expressed by Legendre symbols, $(a,b)_p=(-1)^{\alpha\beta\epsilon(p)}(\frac{u}{p})^{\beta}(\frac{v}{p})^{\alpha}$, but it seems this expression only take $\pm1$, but $Br(\mathbb{Q}_p)=\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$. $\endgroup$ – Qixiao Nov 14 '18 at 17:37
  • $\begingroup$ That section is about the quadratic Hilbert symbol, which corresponds to $2$-torsion in the Brauer group. Scroll down further for the general Hilbert symbol $\endgroup$ – Qiaochu Yuan Nov 14 '18 at 19:56
  • $\begingroup$ @QiaochuYuan Thanks! But is the Artin symbol easier to calculate explicitly? For example we have two integers $2,3\in\mathbb{Z}$ and a $4$-th root of unity $\zeta$ in $\mathbb{Q}_5$, is there an explicit way to determine what the class of $(2,3)_{\zeta}$ in $\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$ is?(As for quadratic symbols, this can be determined by solution of a degenerate conic) $\endgroup$ – Qixiao Nov 14 '18 at 20:12

I should clarify going into this that I don't know any class field theory, so I might say some silly things. The number you're trying to compute is the Hasse invariant of the cyclic algebra, and it should also correspond to a Hilbert symbol as in the comments. I found a nice formula for a special case of the Hilbert symbol in Section 3.3 of these notes (Lemma 3.22). Specialized to this case it gives

$$(a, b)_{\xi} = \omega \left( (-1)^{\nu(a) \nu(b)} \frac{b^{\nu(a)}}{a^{\nu(b)}} \bmod p \right)$$

where $\nu : \mathbb{Q}_p \to \mathbb{Z}$ is the valuation and $\omega : \mathbb{F}_p^{\times} \to \mu_{p-1}(\mathbb{Q}_p)$ is the Teichmüller character.

You asked in the comments about $p = 5, a = 2, b = 3$. In this case $\nu(a) = \nu(b) = 0$ so the Hilbert symbol is trivial. In order for it to be nontrivial at least one of $\nu(a)$ and $\nu(b)$ must be nonzero. For example, sticking to $p = 5$, if we take $a = 2, b = 5$ then we get

$$(1, 5)_{\xi} = \omega \left( \frac{1}{2} \bmod 5 \right) = \omega(3)$$

which is the unique $4^{th}$ root of unity in $\mathbb{Z}_5$ congruent to $3 \bmod 5$, and in particular primitive. Unfortunately I don't know exactly how this is identified with an element of $\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$, although it must be either $\frac{1}{4}$ or $\frac{3}{4}$.

  • $\begingroup$ I've tried to decide the last question in my answer, please check if you agree. $\endgroup$ – Torsten Schoeneberg Jan 26 at 6:47

Qiaochu Yuan's answer gives good insight into computing the Hilbert symbol here, giving the result as an element of $\mu_{p-1}(\Bbb Q_p)$; but it avoids the machinery of cyclic (division) algebras which are sort of the original setting to define the Hasse invariant as element of $Br(\Bbb Q_p) \simeq \Bbb Q/\Bbb Z$. I want to amend that. It turns out that in the example at the end of his answer, whether the result is $\frac14$ or $\frac34$ depends on (some conventions, and:) which primitive $(p-1)$-th root of unity $\zeta$ you choose in the original question.

References: I learned a lot of this stuff from R. Pierce: Associative Algebras (GTM 88, Springer, 1982) and I. Reiner: Maximal Orders (LMS Monographs 5, Academic Press, 1975) some years ago, although I don't have them at hand by now, so I cannot even guarantee that I follow the exact same conventions.

Namely, let us restrict to $p \neq 2$ for simplicity, and to the basic interesting case $\nu(a) = 0, \nu(b) =1$, i.e. $a\in \Bbb Z_p^\times \simeq \mu_{p-1} \times (1+\Bbb Z_p)$. Since elements in the second factor have $(p-1)$-th roots, we can easily restrict to the case $a \in \mu_{p-1}$; however, for your definition of the cyclic algebra to work, I think we should further restrict to the case that $a$ is a primitive $(p-1)$-th root of unity. Namely, now one would usually define the cyclic algebra as follows: Let $r \in \overline{\Bbb Q_p}$ satisfy $r^{p-1}=a$. The extension $L= \Bbb Q_p(r) \vert \Bbb Q_p$ is the unique unramified extension of degree $p-1$; its Galois group is cyclic and has a distinct generator, namely the (lift of the) Frobenius, let's call it $\sigma$. Then the cyclic algebra you define can be realised as a subalgebra of $M_{(p-1) \times (p-1)}(L)$, generated by

$x:= \pmatrix{r&0& &\\ 0&\zeta^{-1} r& &\\ && \ddots &0\\ &&0&\zeta^{2-p}r}$ and $y:= \pmatrix{0&1&0& &\\ 0&0&1 &&\\ &&\ddots& \ddots &\\ &&& &1\\ b&&&0&0}.$

Note that we have $x^{p-1}=a$ and $y^{p-1}=b$ as well as $yxy^{-1}= \zeta^{-1}x$, as demanded. One checks that this is a division algebra, which contains as a subfield the diagonal matrices

$$\pmatrix{z&0& &\\ 0&\tau(z)& &\\ && \ddots &0\\ &&0&\tau^{p-1}(z)}$$

where $z \in L$ and $\tau \in Gal(L\vert \Bbb Q_p)$ is the automorphism induced by $r\mapsto \zeta^{-1}r.$ We identify this subfield with $L$. This division algebra, which in this case corresponds exactly to your definition of $(a,b)_\zeta$, is usually denoted by something like $(L\vert \Bbb Q_p, \tau, b)$.

Now the original definition of the Hasse invariant goes like this: One can extend the $p$-adic valuation $\nu$ to a valuation of the division algebra. Note that e.g. $\nu(x) = 0$ and $\nu(y) = \dfrac{1}{p-1}$. In the division algebra, there exist elements $\gamma$ such that the Frobenius $\sigma$ on $L$ is induced by conjugation with $\gamma$, i.e.

$$\gamma z \gamma^{-1} = \sigma(z) \text{ for all } z \in L . (*)$$

Then the Hasse invariant is (well-)defined as $\nu(\gamma) + \Bbb Z \in \Bbb Q/ \Bbb Z$.

A quick calculation shows that $\sigma(r) = ar$. Now find $1\le k \le p-1$ such that $\tau^k = \sigma$, or in other words, $\zeta^{-k} = a$. Then one checks that $\gamma := y^k$ satisfies $(*)$ and hence

$$(a,b)_\zeta = \dfrac{k}{n} + \Bbb Z \in \Bbb Q / \Bbb Z.$$

In the example $a=2, b=p=5$ of the other answer, it depends: There are two primitive $4$-th roots of unity in $\Bbb Q_5$, namely $\omega(2)$ and $\omega(3)$ ($\omega$ denoting the Teichmüller map). With your definitions we have

$$(2,5)_{\omega(2)} = \dfrac{3}{4} + \Bbb Z$$ $$(2,5)_{\omega(3)} = \dfrac{1}{4} + \Bbb Z$$

Unravelling many restrictions we made:

For $a \in \Bbb Z_p^\times, b \in p \Bbb Z_p$, we have $$(a,b)_{\zeta} = \dfrac{k}{p-1} + \Bbb Z \in \Bbb Q/\Bbb Z \simeq Br(\Bbb Q_p)$$ where $\zeta^{-k} \equiv a$ mod $p$.

And from there one easily generalises to (consistent with the formula in Qiaochu's answer):

For $a \in \Bbb Z_p^\times, b \in \Bbb Q_p$, we have $$(a,b)_{\zeta} = \nu(b)\dfrac{k}{p-1} + \Bbb Z \in \Bbb Q/\Bbb Z \simeq Br(\Bbb Q_p)$$ where $\zeta^{-k} \equiv a$ mod $p$.

(The only class field theory that goes into this case is basic Kummer theory, relating $\sigma$ and $\tau$ and $\mu_{p-1}$.)

Note that if one rewrote conjugation in $(*)$ as $\gamma^{-1}z\gamma$, everything would be multiplied by $(-1)$ in $\Bbb Q/\Bbb Z$ which in Qiaochu's example would exactly flip the two values $\frac14$ and $\frac34$. So in a way, it's really a convention which one is which. However, if one looks at the full Brauer group instead of just the $p-1$-torsion part as here, one indeed has to fix such a convention.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.