It is given on page #21 of U.G. book : Combinatorics - A guided Tour, by David Mazur, here an example detailing chances of getting three-of-a-kind in 5 card hands.

The problem statement is : From a standard 52-card deck, how many different five-card hands are possible? How likely is it that you will be dealt three-of-a-kind?

Solution approach for the second part is:

Encode each hand as a 5-list : A B C D E; where :

  1. A is the denomination of the three-of-a-kind
    $\implies$ 13 ways to choose

  2. B is the 3-set of suits for the three-of-a-kind
    $\implies$ $\binom{4}{3}$

  3. C is a 2-set of denominations for the other two cards
    $\implies$ $\binom{12}{2}$

  4. D is the suit of the smaller denomination in C
    $\implies$ $4$ ways to choose D

  5. E is the suit of the larger denomination in C
    $\implies$ $4$ ways to choose E

The chances are given by the product rule.

My doubt is in question #24 following that. It asks to find wrong with the below alternate approach:

There are $52$ ways to select the first card that is a part of the three-of-a-kind. Then there are $\binom{3}{2}$ ways to pick the other two cards to make up the three-of-a-kind. Finally, there are $\binom{48}{2}$ ways to pick the other two cards (any cards except those of the denomination of the three-of-a-kind). By the product principle there are $52\cdot \binom{3}{2} \cdot \binom{48}{2}$.

My answer needs vetting, and is stated below in two parts. The first part concerns the first two steps:

(i) To have $52$ ways for the first card seems fine, & so is the next step to have $\binom{3}{2}$ ways to pick the other two cards.
But the issue is that the product of first steps (by the first approach) leads to: $13\cdot \binom{4}{3} = 13\cdot 4 = 52$, while the second approach's first two steps lead to : $52\cdot \binom{3}{2} = 52\cdot 3=156$.

In order to explain the multiplication factor of $3$, consider a smaller example of smaller number of denominations (let, $3$) & the same number of (i.e., $4$) suits; as it is the # of suits that matter in terms of picking three-of-a-kind. $$ \left[ \begin{array}{c|c|c} &A&B&C&D\\ 1&1A&1B&1C&1D\\ 2&2A&2B&2C&2D\\ 3&3A&3B&3C&3D\\ \end{array} \right] $$

The duplication of choices, by factor of $\binom{3}{2}=3$, is shown below for the above small case, by considering only the first denomination (i.e. $1$), with 1A1B1C, 1A1B1D, 1A1C1D, 1B1C1D occuring $3$ times each.
I have shown only $4$ cases for the first row (i.e, denomination = $1$), but it can be easily shown that there are a total of $12(=4*3)\cdot 3= 36$ cases, of which only $12$ are original, explaining the overcount's multiplier factor of $\binom{3}{2}=3$.

$$ \left[ \begin{array}{c|c|c|c} 1A&1A1B1C&1A1B1D&1A1C1D\\ 1B&1B1C1A&1B1A1D&1B1C1D\\ 1C&1C1A1B&1C1A1D&1C1B1D\\ 1D&1D1A1B&1D1A1C&1D1B1C\\ \end{array} \right] $$

(ii) Next comes the difference between the first approach's last 3 steps, & the second approach taking $\binom{48}{2}$.
The first approach leads to: $(\binom{12}{2}=66) \cdot (\binom{4}{1}=4) (\binom{4}{1}=4) = 66*16 = 1056$,
while the second approach leads to: $\binom{48}{2}=24*47= 1128$.

Second part analysis: The definition of three-of-a-kind considers the denomination of the rest two cards to be different, irrespective of their suits.
If take $\binom{48}{2}$, then also consider the cases where the third card is of the same denomination as second. This leads to an extra number of cases, that need be subtracted.
I am stating here subtraction, as the number of chances for second case are found by application of sum rule.

To show how it works, by considering the original example; have extra $1128-1056 = 72$ cases.
Only $12$ denominations are available for the 4th & 5th cards, but the two cards need have different denominations. So, either can be of higher denomination than the other.

Assuming, that denomination $1$ is taken up by the three-of-a-kind; then $12$ denominations are left. In each denomination there are still $3$ more suits (for the over-calculation to occur) leading to $12*3=36$ cases, which by ordering should lead to $36*2=72$ cases.

a) Fourth card denomination = $2$, fifth card denomination choices are = $3, 4, \cdots, 13$, a total of $12$ choices.
b) Similarly, the chances based on other denominations of fourth card are : $11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1$.
This sums up to : $12 \cdot 6 = 72$ cases.

  • $\begingroup$ Too long; didn't read. But I don't like step 2 in the book solution. Where does the 6 in $6\choose3$ come from? $\endgroup$ – Gerry Myerson Nov 12 '18 at 4:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @GerryMyerson Sorry for error. Edited the OP. $\endgroup$ – jiten Nov 12 '18 at 5:05
  • $\begingroup$ 52 is wrong as there are only 13 ranks. Combin(48;2) is wrong as it could include pairs. $\endgroup$ – paparazzo Nov 12 '18 at 15:04
  • $\begingroup$ @paparazzo I hope that the first error introduces a multiplicative factor of $3$, while the second error introduces an additive factor of $72$; as shown above. $\endgroup$ – jiten Nov 13 '18 at 0:20
  • $\begingroup$ @jiten You hope for error? $\endgroup$ – paparazzo Nov 13 '18 at 2:19

For the first part, we can cut down the multiple counting by first converting the problem to a problem that consider order to matter and then remove it.

$$52 \cdot \binom32 \cdot \frac{2!}{3!}=52.$$

For the second part, to reduce those that are from the same denomination:

$$12 \cdot \binom43=72$$

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, but request elaboration of the ratio $\frac{2!}{3!}$, as seemingly it is just reverse of $3C2$. $\endgroup$ – jiten Nov 14 '18 at 4:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ How would you answer the question, what are the number of possibility to pick $3$ cards out of $52$ such that $3$ of them share the same denomination where order matters? After you answer that, divide it by $3!$. $\endgroup$ – Siong Thye Goh Nov 14 '18 at 5:11
  • $\begingroup$ I feel that your last comment has an error in the last word, i.e. should end with $3$. $\endgroup$ – jiten Nov 14 '18 at 6:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ for having $3$ cards where order matters is $52 \times 3 \times 2$ right? to remove the order factor, divide by $3!$. $\endgroup$ – Siong Thye Goh Nov 14 '18 at 6:50
  • $\begingroup$ If you want to remove just the order factor of $3!$, then why multiply by $2!$ also. $\endgroup$ – jiten Nov 14 '18 at 8:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.