4
$\begingroup$

I'm a math tutor at a small university. One of my students asked me about the problem, $$p - 2\sqrt{p} = 15$$ Solving this, we found, in sequence, $$-2\sqrt{p}=15 - p$$ $$4p = p^2 - 30 p + 225$$ $$p^2 - 34 p + 225 = 0$$ then, using quadratic formula, $$p = \frac{-(-34) \pm \sqrt{34^2 - 4(1)(225)}}{2(1)}$$ $$p = \frac{34 \pm \sqrt{256}}{2}$$

Note the positive discriminant suggesting two solutions. Solving resulted in $$p = \frac{34 \pm 16}{2} = 25, 9$$

Checking the solution, we have $$25 - 2\sqrt{25} = 15$$ $$15 = 15$$ and then $$9 - 2\sqrt{9} = 15$$ $$3 = 15$$

And I can't for the life of me figure out why 9 doesn't solve the initial equation, despite being a solution given by the quadratic formula. Looking at the graph of $y = p^2 - 34p + 225$ shows that 9 and 25 should be solutions, but the graph of $y = p - 2\sqrt{p} - 15$ has only one solution at $p = 25$, and is not remotely equivalent to the first graph. What changed? In addition, the first graph suggests to me that $p - 2\sqrt{p} = 15$ might have an additional, but imaginary, solution; but I have no idea how I might find it.

I googled around for about thirty minutes, and didn't find anyone asking the same question. This question about mechanics appears similar but doesn't yield a satisfactory answer as to why one solution doesn't work. (Typical physicists, am I right my friends? Heehee.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Did you try substituting $p=9$ in your second written equation? And in your third one? $\endgroup$ – Arnaud D. Nov 9 '18 at 17:20
  • $\begingroup$ To get rid of the square root you square both parts. It's OK to do this only when both part have the same sign, otherwise you can get extra solutions (i.e. $(-2)^2=2^2$). You have $-2\sqrt{p}=15 - p$ which should give you $p \ge 15$ as a condition for possible roots because LHS is non-positive $\endgroup$ – Vasya Nov 9 '18 at 17:21
  • $\begingroup$ Vasya, wouldn't leaving $p < 15$ allow for an imaginary solution? $\endgroup$ – Natalie Webb Nov 9 '18 at 18:09
  • $\begingroup$ Because requiring $p \geq 15$ would imply the assumption that $-2\sqrt{p}$ is non-positive, not considering that $\sqrt{p}$ may itself be negative. $\endgroup$ – Natalie Webb Nov 9 '18 at 18:22
  • $\begingroup$ The quadratic formula is irrelevant. It's important to realize that squaring both sides of an equation can introduce extraneous solutions. Indeed, this is a crucial part of this topic (solving radical equations). See this google search for more information. $\endgroup$ – Dave L. Renfro Nov 9 '18 at 18:41
2
$\begingroup$

Note that $\sqrt p$ means the positive square root of $p$. The negative square root of $9$ would be $-3$, which would have fulfilled the equation. The original equation also could have been factored as $(\sqrt p-5)(\sqrt p+3)=0$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Mike, what you're saying is that factoring to $(\sqrt{p} - 5)(\sqrt{p} + 3)$ results in $\sqrt{p} = -3, 5$, but $\sqrt{p}$ as a function must return a positive number, meaning that $\sqrt{p} = -3$ can't be a solution? $\endgroup$ – Natalie Webb Nov 9 '18 at 18:51
  • $\begingroup$ @NatalieWebb That's a fair way of putting it. The basic idea is you added another root when you squared both sides. If $(15-p)^2-4p=0$, then $(15-p-2\sqrt p)(15-p+2\sqrt p)=0$ $\endgroup$ – Mike Nov 9 '18 at 20:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.