0
$\begingroup$

Prove that the alternating group $A_{n}$ is generated by all products of two 2-cycles ($i$,$j$)($k$,$l$). These 2-cycles are not necessarily disjoint.

So I know that $A_{n}$ can be written as products of even number of transpositions. In order to prove the statement, we have to prove that we can write any element in $A_{n}$ as ($i$,$j$)($k$,$l$). Equivalently, we have to prove that we can write any transposition using any product of two 2-cycles ($i$,$j$)($k$,$l$). Is my reasoning correct?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is easier than you think. Also note that a transposition is an odd permutation, so there are no transpositions in $A_n$. But if you have a product of an even number of transpositions, how can you see it also as a product of the kind you want? $\endgroup$ – Mark Bennet Nov 7 '18 at 16:48
  • $\begingroup$ @MarkBennet When you say that it is easier than I think, I'm sure that there's something important I have missed. Wondering if you can give me more hint? $\endgroup$ – JJW22 Nov 7 '18 at 16:57
1
$\begingroup$

I think you have answered the question yourself. But your second sentence is wrong: "In order to prove the statement, we have to prove that we can write any element in $A_n$ as $(i,j)(k,l)$". That couldn't be true if $n$ were large. When we say that a group is generated by a set of elements, it doesn't mean that every element in the group is one of those; it means that every element can be written as a a finite number of products of them.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi, wondering if you can elaborate on how I have answered my question. Still struggling to see the point here. Thank you! $\endgroup$ – JJW22 Nov 7 '18 at 16:59
  • $\begingroup$ Well you said that every element of $A_n$ is the product of an even number of transpositions. For any such expression, takes the first two transpositions, then the next two, and so on, and you have your proof. $\endgroup$ – Richard Martin Nov 7 '18 at 17:07
  • $\begingroup$ I think I misunderstood the question. I thought that by products of two 2-cycles, it means that we have to prove that every element in $A_{n}$ can be written as a single (i,j)(k,l). $\endgroup$ – JJW22 Nov 7 '18 at 17:10
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, hence my first comment/answer. You wouldn't be able to prove that in, for example, $A_5$, because a single $(i,j)(k,l)$ wouldn't be able to 'move enough things around', e.g. $(12345)$ could not be thus written. $\endgroup$ – Richard Martin Nov 7 '18 at 17:12
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! Really appreciate your patience! $\endgroup$ – JJW22 Nov 7 '18 at 17:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.