0
$\begingroup$

I'm having some difficulties with the following problem:

Let $n\in \mathbb N$ and: $$ x_n = \frac{n-3}{\sqrt{n^2+1}} $$ Prove $x_n$ is a monotonic sequence starting from some $n_0$.

I've applied the following test to prove that. Suppose $\frac{x_n}{x_{n+1}} > 1$

$$ \frac{n-3}{\sqrt{n^2+1}}\cdot\frac{\sqrt{(n+1)^2+1}}{n-2} > 1 \iff \\ \iff \frac{n-3}{n-2} >\frac{\sqrt{n^2+1}}{\sqrt{(n+1)^2+1}} $$

Now squaring both sides (this is BTW where i think things get wrong): $$ \left(\frac{n-3}{n-2}\right)^2 >\frac{{n^2+1}}{{(n+1)^2+1}} \iff \\ \iff (n-3)^2((n+1)^2+1)>(n^2 + 1)(n-2)^2 $$

After some algebraic transformations one may get: $$ 3 n^2 - 5n - 7 < 0 $$

Now find $n_0 \ge 1$ starting from which the inequality holds: $$ n_{1,2} = \frac{5 \pm\sqrt{109}}{6} $$

So from this $n \approx2.57 < 3$. So for $n \ge 3$ the inequality holds. But that's not true! From the graph it's crystal clear that $x_n$ is monotonically increasing $\forall n \ge 1$.

Where did things go wrong? I believe it's a consequence of squaring the inequality, but can't see how it went wrong.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hint: what happens when $2 \le n < 3$? $\endgroup$ – Rob Arthan Nov 5 '18 at 18:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Even ignoring the potential division by zero, the squaring step introduces a $\implies$ (instead of the $\iff$ at all other steps). So nothing is wrong with concluding "IF the quotient is $>1$ and $n\ge 0$, THEN $n\ge 3$" $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Nov 5 '18 at 18:45
  • $\begingroup$ x_0=-3.x_1=-2/√2,x_3=0, increasing .For n>3 start proving. $\endgroup$ – Peter Szilas Nov 5 '18 at 18:58
1
$\begingroup$

For all $n\geq3$ we obtain: $$x_{n+1}-x_n=\frac{n-2}{\sqrt{n^2+2n+2}}-\frac{n-3}{\sqrt{n^2+1}}=$$ $$=\frac{2(3n^2-5n-7)}{\sqrt{(n^2+2n+2)(n^2+1)}((n-2)\sqrt{n^2+1}+(n-3)\sqrt{n^2+2n+2})}>0,$$ which says that our sequence increases for $n\geq3$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Isn't $x_n$ ($a_n$ in your answer) still monotonic for $n \in [1, 2]>$ $\endgroup$ – roman Nov 5 '18 at 19:20
  • $\begingroup$ @roman It was typo. I fixed. You look for the proof that $x$ is monotonic from some $n_0$. No? I have a proof that your sequence decreases for all natural $n$, but it's another problem. $\endgroup$ – Michael Rozenberg Nov 5 '18 at 19:36
  • $\begingroup$ Well, your answer indeed shows that for $n\ge 3$. I'm just wondering why $n = 1,2$ are missed. $\endgroup$ – roman Nov 5 '18 at 19:54
  • $\begingroup$ @roman Because for $n=1$ the denominator is negative. We need another way. But it's another problem already. $\endgroup$ – Michael Rozenberg Nov 5 '18 at 19:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.