I have this result which I do not understand.

This is the statement of the result:

Suppose G is a group acting on a finite set X with fixed point set A (i.e. elements of X which are mapped to themselves for all G). Let X1,...Xm be the (disjoint) orbits of G in X with |Xi| Greater than or equal to 2, and let Hi be the stabilizer of a point in Xi for each i ∈ {1,...m}. Then each Hi has finite index [G : Hi] in G and m |X| =|A| + sum over i ∈ {1,...m} of [G : Hi].

So here are my thoughts. I think that this is equal to the size of X because they are summing over all the orbits.

|A| Is the sum of orbits of size 1 (as if all elements of G stabilise x, there is one element in the orbit, x).

For the second term in the sum, I believe that this is summing over all orbits of size greater than 2. So as there are m orbits in total, then this means that [G:Hi] is the size of each orbit (greater than or equal to 2). This is the bit I don’t get.

We know from the orbit stabilizer theorem that each orbit Xi is isomorphic to all the left cosets of Hi in G. But does this imply the thing I do not understand? I am struggling to visualise this. I understand that in an orbit, each element of the orbit uniquely defines a left coset of the stabilizer of an element.


Let $X_i$ be one of the orbits mentioned in your question.

Moreover, let $p \in X_i$ and $H_i$ be the stabilizer of $p$, as in your question.

Since $p \in X_i$, we have $X_i = Gp$.

Now, the orbit-stabilizer theorem says that the map

$$ \phi: G/H_i \rightarrow X_i, \quad gH_i \mapsto gp $$

is a bijection between the set of cosets $G/H_i$ and the orbit $X_i = Gp$.

From the assumption that $X$ is finite, we get that $X_i \subseteq X$ is finite, and also

$$ |G/H_i| = [G : H_i ] < \infty. $$

(You already mentioned in your question that $H_i$ has finite index in $G$.)

But then $\phi$ is a bijection between two finite sets. So those sets must have the same size. So we have

$$ [G : H_i] = |G/H_i| = X_i. $$

By the way, this argument also works for orbits of size $1$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, I get it now. I wasn’t using OST correctly I think. $\endgroup$ – jacobe Nov 6 '18 at 7:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.