6
$\begingroup$

Given an arbitrary parameterization of a differentiable curve $r: R\rightarrow R^n$ in terms of some variable $t$, we can re-parameterize (although perhaps not in closed-form) $r$ in terms of its arclength $s$. This gives a handy representation where as $s$ increases by 1, we move 1 unit along $r$ in $R^n$.

Is is 1) possible and 2) comparably straightforward to do this for surfaces? I.e. if $r: R^m \rightarrow R^n$ is differentiable can we reparameterize $r$ so that moving 1 unit in $R^m$ moves us 1 unit along the surface $r$ in $R^n$?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I like to think of the Gauss map of an analogue of "arclength reparametrization" for a surface. $\endgroup$ – MisterRiemann Oct 29 '18 at 17:39
13
$\begingroup$

No, this latter would mean that any manifold is locally isometric to an Euclidean space with its flat metric. This is only true in dimension $1$ by the mean of arclength parametrization as you pointed out, the first obstruction coming to my mind being the curvature.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The quantity of things that don't generalize neatly from 1-D to n-D causes me no end of amazement, delight and frustration. $\endgroup$ – Scott Oct 29 '18 at 18:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I agree that the delight part is strong here: the article images.math.cnrs.fr/Un-theoreme-et-une-part-de-pizza (in french) explains curvature and how the fundamental theorem dealing with it helps us to properly eat pizzas. $\endgroup$ – Balloon Oct 29 '18 at 18:14
  • $\begingroup$ This is infinitely more clear after having read the pizza article. :) $\endgroup$ – Scott Oct 29 '18 at 20:49
  • $\begingroup$ Glad to hear that! :) $\endgroup$ – Balloon Oct 29 '18 at 20:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.