0
$\begingroup$

I am given that $F \subseteq L$ and $L$ is an extension. Now, I am also given $T: L \to L$, $x \mapsto \alpha x$ and $m(x)\in F[x]$ to be the minimal polynomial of $T$ in $F$.

I have to demonstrate that $m$ is also the monic polynomial in $F[x]$ of minimal degree for which $m(\alpha)=0$, which means showing that $m$ is minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ over $F$.

Now, I think that we are usually familiar with showing and defining the minimal polynomial by what I said on the third sentence. This question is asking you to prove the converse, and I am not exactly sure how to even start this. Any tips as to how should I start? Help would be appreciated.

Thank you.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ So, the minimal polinomial of $T$ in $L$ is $m(x)=x-\alpha$. Is $\alpha$ in $F$? $\endgroup$ Oct 29 '18 at 1:32
  • $\begingroup$ Since I was given that $\alpha \in L$, I would assume it would be since $L$ is the field extension? $\endgroup$
    – dmsj djsl
    Oct 29 '18 at 1:36
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, so I didn't get it. Since $T(x)=\alpha x$, we have that $x-\alpha$ is the minimal polynomial of $T$ in $L$. And if $x-\alpha$ is the minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ in $F$, then it means that $\alpha\in F$, which is not necessarily true. $\endgroup$ Oct 29 '18 at 1:42
  • $\begingroup$ I guess the exercise wants the minimal polynomial of $T$ in $F$, that is the minimal polynomial $m(x)\in F[x]$ such that $m(T)=0$. $\endgroup$ Oct 29 '18 at 1:44
  • $\begingroup$ I am given that $m \in F[x]$ $\endgroup$
    – dmsj djsl
    Oct 29 '18 at 1:45
1
$\begingroup$

Follow these steps:

(1) Verify that $\alpha$ is a root of $m(x)$.

Indeed, since $T=\alpha Id$, and $m(T)=0$, $$ \begin{array}{rcl} m(x)=a_nx^n+...+a_1x+a_0 & \Rightarrow & 0=m(T)=a_n\alpha^nId+...+a_1\alpha Id+a_0Id \\ & \Rightarrow & (a_n\alpha^n+...+a_1\alpha+a_0)Id = 0 \\ & \Rightarrow & m(\alpha) = a_n\alpha^n+...+a_1\alpha+a_0 = 0. \end{array} $$ (2) Since $\alpha$ is a root of $m(x)$, the minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ in $F$, $m_\alpha(x)\in F[x]$, divides $m(x)$.

(3) But then, since $m(x)$ is irreducible, the fact that $m_\alpha(x)$ divides $m(x)$ implies that $m(x)=m_\alpha(x)$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ sorry, what is $\alpha Id$? $\endgroup$
    – dmsj djsl
    Oct 29 '18 at 1:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $\alpha Id$ is the multiplication of the scalar $\alpha$ with the linear operator identity $Id$. $\endgroup$ Oct 29 '18 at 2:00
  • $\begingroup$ It's another way of viewing $T$. The definition $T(x)=\alpha x$, means that $T=\alpha Id$. $\endgroup$ Oct 29 '18 at 2:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.